7 times since 1998, we had a fall of more than 25% on Index level.
The min and max time period b/w 2 subsequent falls was 16 months & 45 months.
If you can not digest the fall of 25-40% once every 3-5 years, you shouldn't own stocks. Prepare for the worse & invest for the best

More from The_Chartist 📈
It is important to analyse the strength of the breakout. If the price does not continues the move in 1 or 2 sessions and candles show long upper wicks, it is better to bring the SL closer. Distribution sign.
Will be helpful in next breakouts. https://t.co/AtZOj4bKeT

Learning: Strong breakout
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@nison_steve) July 2, 2021
1. Breakout candle will have no upper shadow or extremely less compared to the body
2. Volumes will be high (to avoid retailers to enter & also big hand absorbing all the selling)
3. Pullbacks will be rare/very less
4. Happens after a long consolidation pic.twitter.com/YTHDOnEdxo
AWL - look at the ranges of contraction on the chart https://t.co/2XMhqZQu8X

Borosil Renewables - Patterns like these must be looked at carefully and must be kept on the radar. Herein price is contracting which generally signifies shifting of hands (from weak to strong). If you go wrong, the risk is limited in these. pic.twitter.com/iqyoeslZjy
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) July 12, 2021
Russell 2000
It is better if you spend considerable time learning these concepts. https://t.co/caBHOO4Owa

TRAPS? In a false breakout, the price breaks out of the range & comes back within the range. A trap is one step ahead, price not only comes back within the range but breaks down in the opposite direction. It traps the initial longs who didn't close their positions
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@charts_zone) January 22, 2022
Russell 2000 pic.twitter.com/txzjdnStzc
You May Also Like
Ironies of Luck https://t.co/5BPWGbAxFi
— Morgan Housel (@morganhousel) March 14, 2018
"Luck is the flip side of risk. They are mirrored cousins, driven by the same thing: You are one person in a 7 billion player game, and the accidental impact of other people\u2019s actions can be more consequential than your own."
I’ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.
In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the person’s part, whereas “smart” luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.
So, was I “lucky” to be born when I was—nothing I had any control over—and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write “What Works on Wall Street?” Absolutely.
Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.