Contrary to the popular opinion that Nifty is going to give a pullback and then a fall towards 16k, my studies are saying that we are going for a puke without a significant pullback.
#nifty50
More from Aakash Gangwar
Opposite is happening now. IHNS, double bottom, +ve RSI divergences, etc are failing badly for permanent reversal. Level up your SAR game to stay in the game on both sides.
#bearrun
#BearMarket
#bearrun
#BearMarket
Head & Shoulders pattern, double top and bearish RSI divergences fail more often in bull market and generally gives a very good SAR trade. Vice versa is also true for bear market.#bullrun #BullMarket
— Aakash Gangwar (@akashgngwr823) February 9, 2021
More from Nifty
#Nifty -- Going good so far forming triangle as expected.
Till it breakouts expect pendulum swings within this structure.
I am positive for 19300-20000 above 18350.
Bottoms 16800-17000 in place and 200dema at 16600. Dont see any big cut. @moneyworks4u_fa https://t.co/lceGFlDyRM
Till it breakouts expect pendulum swings within this structure.
I am positive for 19300-20000 above 18350.
Bottoms 16800-17000 in place and 200dema at 16600. Dont see any big cut. @moneyworks4u_fa https://t.co/lceGFlDyRM
#Nifty taking a shape of triangle rather than CNH.
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) January 29, 2022
Confirmation point is same 18350 and targets also same as below \U0001f447
Traingle /CNH whats in a name as long as targets and Confirmation point is same. https://t.co/vfM1odTd94
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x