That makes NIFTY an outlier, with the philosophical question being for how long can we persist?
NIFTY & US 10 Year Yield have a high degree of positive directional correlation. Anyhow, they are diverging at the moment though the divergence can go on for a long period of time as well, last time around this divergence did not work well for NIFTY & it got pulled down.

That makes NIFTY an outlier, with the philosophical question being for how long can we persist?
More from Piyush Chaudhry
In such a case, H&S can be either a continuation pattern or compound fulcrum.
This is how to differentiate:
• if right shoulder is smaller than left, most likely a continuation H&S
• if right is same or higher than left, and the price is not coming to neckline, most likely CF
This is how to differentiate:
• if right shoulder is smaller than left, most likely a continuation H&S
• if right is same or higher than left, and the price is not coming to neckline, most likely CF
sir a doubt does head & shoulders work in down trend ? pic.twitter.com/dytYmbzOfp
— Vega_Greek (@VegaGreek) May 13, 2021
More from Nifty
#Nifty
So now that Nifty has undergone ABC correction in the expected manner, what to expect next?
I think we have started larger degree wave 3, once 16800 was crossed.
16800 is the reference level now. We will get more sense by end of next week/ month. https://t.co/KsziuUpZxU
#NIFTY
If 17445 is taken out, then may be we are heading to fresh new all time on Nifty.
Things may pan out way faster than expected.
#NIFTY
Zoomed in cross-section of the chart above.
Wave 3 of 1 should have started today, which can take Nifty to fresh all time highs.
#NIFTY
So now Nifty is moving more clearly on the expected path, what's next?
Nifty has started longer term wave 3 advancement, pending final confirmation of HH by crossing 17800.
In Wave 1 of 3, can expect a move to 20k+.
In terms of longer term wave structure:
Wave 1: 7500 to 18600
Wave 3: 15700 to 35000+
And this can pan out over next 2 years or so.
Since wave 2 was a shallow correction, wave 4 can potentially be a deeper correction.
So now that Nifty has undergone ABC correction in the expected manner, what to expect next?
I think we have started larger degree wave 3, once 16800 was crossed.
16800 is the reference level now. We will get more sense by end of next week/ month. https://t.co/KsziuUpZxU

I am no expert in Wave Theory, but can this be a possible path over next few weeks/months?
— Mayank Narula (@Mayank_Narula1) December 6, 2021
Views requested. @idineshptl @indiacharts @nishkumar1977 pic.twitter.com/u3DjEeqoqB
#NIFTY
If 17445 is taken out, then may be we are heading to fresh new all time on Nifty.
Things may pan out way faster than expected.

#NIFTY
Zoomed in cross-section of the chart above.
Wave 3 of 1 should have started today, which can take Nifty to fresh all time highs.

#NIFTY
So now Nifty is moving more clearly on the expected path, what's next?
Nifty has started longer term wave 3 advancement, pending final confirmation of HH by crossing 17800.
In Wave 1 of 3, can expect a move to 20k+.

In terms of longer term wave structure:
Wave 1: 7500 to 18600
Wave 3: 15700 to 35000+
And this can pan out over next 2 years or so.
Since wave 2 was a shallow correction, wave 4 can potentially be a deeper correction.

You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".