Breakout Soon Candidates!
1- Fortis Healthcare
2- Bajaj Holding
3- Navin Fluorine
4- Tech Mahindra
Keep on Radar.
Getting Ready for Breakouts!

More from Chartmojo
More from Navinfluorine
#NAVINFLUOR -- Once again on Radar With such an interesting Pattern .
On my Radar for Tomorrow and Going forward.
Plan your Trade, Trade your Plan.
#flyingvikas #technical #nse #trading #Keepitsimple
#Cadlestick #Gap #Breakout #BREAKOUTSTOCKS #stokes #trading https://t.co/h5MrVDXOHS
On my Radar for Tomorrow and Going forward.
Plan your Trade, Trade your Plan.
#flyingvikas #technical #nse #trading #Keepitsimple
#Cadlestick #Gap #Breakout #BREAKOUTSTOCKS #stokes #trading https://t.co/h5MrVDXOHS

#NAVINFLUOR-- last time it was an interesting chart which remains interesting
— VVikas Kumaarr (@flyingvikas129) July 7, 2021
Dedicated to @madav1401
. https://t.co/IL4AYpqopP pic.twitter.com/Ej0rw6NcX0
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?