MINDTREE
Double Top Buy above 2233.36 daily close on 1% Box size chart. https://t.co/Grtz9Pi3vU
MINDTREE
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) December 22, 2020
The company is an international information technology consulting and implementation organisation that delivers business solutions through global software development.
DTB above 1619.22 daily close on 3% box size chart, DTB active on 1% chart. https://t.co/dhQmouQ9Wt pic.twitter.com/g8Rgz7fA0A
More from Saket Reddy
Double Top Buy triggered above 1933.43 daily close on 3% Box size chart. https://t.co/eELxOeNmvg
JBCHEPHARM
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) July 16, 2021
Double Top Buy, Super Pattern - Bullish and T20 Pattern - Bullish triggered above 1886.26 daily close on 1% Box Size chart. https://t.co/bzIsbWjbEP pic.twitter.com/JQVkao635V
They are the real compounders, they've created massive wealth compared to others! https://t.co/PluVwU5OXG
Hope Everyone saw BANDHANBNK Numbers. I feel many such banks will go through a massive NPA Cycle followed by depleted Tier 1.
— Saket Reddy (@saketreddy) January 24, 2021
Hence, stay with the Top 3 banks :-
HDFCBANK
KOTAKBANK
CUB
They've low cost of funding, well provisioned Moratorium book, high ROEs & high Tier 1 CAR.
More from Mindtree
You May Also Like
A thread 🧵
1) Learn Anything - Search tools for knowledge discovery that helps you understand any topic through the most efficient
2) Grad Speeches - Discover the best commencement speeches.
This website is made by me
3) What does the Internet Think - Find out what the internet thinks about anything
4) https://t.co/vuhT6jVItx - Send notes that will self-destruct after being read.
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?