#McDowell
Breaking out as suggested in the morning - "Above 890, more momentum" - this series likely to be 960
For Investors, add & add for 1100 - 1200+ & much more in the coming months.
master any short term target for mcdowell
— bala (@BalaThink) March 17, 2022
More from Van Ilango (JustNifty)
Remembered it & made entry @ open for the "High rewarding 3rd wave"
Much appreciation🙏 to @ap_pune for his regular sharing of vital info. & wisdom from years of experience.
#auropharma "Hour t/f" for "Traders"
— Van Ilango (JustNifty) (@JustNifty) March 21, 2022
In search of the highly rewarding 2nd wave entry.
Today's & tomorrow's #priceaction would have more clarity for entry either @ 615-620 or above 655 https://t.co/20S0Lvc7ej pic.twitter.com/OFlf9MLkqz
You ask me or any other persons, they'll tell you their subjective view however unbiased they attempt to be.
It is their view and not necessarily the market's.
My subjective view is labelled in the charts.
Follow #Priceaction https://t.co/37iXFtWPzU

Currently reading the book you put on your website. Also, from this if we consider 18600 as 5 th wave end of Nifty ideally it's doing the 1st 12345 of downtrend, of which do e already 1234, currently going towards 5 which I believe should go below 100% of 4th retracement wave
— de soloist \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@ChakiArijit) November 4, 2021
More from Mcdowell
A clean and clear chart posted in August.
Updated chart. https://t.co/HCnRuWvIpO

United Spirits Ltd - Monthly Log Scale \U0001f37b pic.twitter.com/kj7jXr8moE
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@nison_steve) August 18, 2021
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".