Trying to achieve success in life is ruthlessly demanding. It is an agonizing, brutal fight, that takes no prisoners and is completely relentless. All around us, nothing but a massive sea of people. Each one, pushing and shoving, knocking the other down.......

and trampling with no regard, whatsoever. We have lost touch and forgotten what is truly important in life. Feelings of remorse, sensitivity and compassion have been completely suppressed. It’s as if those emotions can only be remembered as a golden pastime - like the classic....
games between the Red Sox and the Yankees. Sadly, we have become desensitized.

When meeting someone for the first time, we have reduced ourselves to the most superficial questions known to man. What is your occupation and what title do you hold?......
What neighborhood do you live in? How big is your house and what kind of car do you drive? It's questions like these that have become the basis of our human-social interaction. One's professional and intimate existence is controlled by one thing. The all-mighty dollar..........
Let's just say, one would have a better chance of escaping Alcatraz back in the day, than being considered successful, without having money. Avoiding this stigmatic meteor is virtually impossible - and attempting to do so, only makes the pressure of succumbing.....
to it worse. We are equal. We’re all born as humans. To be blunt, everyone comes into this world covered in shit. Some of us get delicately cleaned off with a "Hotel Collection" bath towel from Macy's, while others get roughly wiped off with one that was purchased from Walmart...
The point is, we are ALL equals. The quality of the towel doesn’t fucking matter. Yet, we continue to wind up divided. People are born into different social classes, with broadly different upbringings and achieve varying levels of education. The issue at hand here though....
is primitive and basic. Why does money possess such incredible power outside of its designated purpose? Success is a term that cannot breathe without money. Money is its oxygen and life-blood. We don’t need money to think, walk or talk - yet for many.......
without having much of it, makes them feel inferior and unworthy. This is about to come to a screeching halt. As the most intelligent species that exist on this earth, how have we allowed money to outsmart us?

Cryptocurrency is on the verge of penetrating every facet of our.....
existence. The positive affect that it will have on the ability for ANYONE to make a good living, will be immense and ground-breaking. The playing field of life is being leveled once and for all......
No matter who you are - no matter where you came from - Life, success, and the meaning of both, will forever be changed.

More from Life

How to get smarter very fast:

Interact with smart people here on Twitter who have different world-views than you do.

And let them change your mind on something.

Here are the 30 people you should follow (along with my favorite tweet from each)👇👇

Twitter can be terrible if you follow negative people.

It can also be more valuable than a college degree if you follow (and network with) the right people.

You get to look right into their brain and read a daily narrative of HOW they think.

Ok lets go:

#1: @ShaanVP

You know he's all about venture capital based entrepreneurship. I'm about small (non-sexy) business. We disagree on a lot of stuff.

But he's done it and he's won. Bonus follow: @theSamParr (@myfirstmilpod podcast


#2: @fortworthchris

He is where I want to be in 15 years. Has built a massive real estate private equity firm from the ground up. Super grounded with what the way he does business and his podcast @theFORTpodcast is top


#3: @Julian

I'm a scattered thinker and procrastinator.

Julian is a master of clear thinking and simple but effective writing. A world class example of content marketing and

You May Also Like

I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x


The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x

Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x

The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x

It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x