in order to answer this one needs to understand a thing well enough to know what success looks like and to know what failure modes exist.
The reason to try a new approach to things is because you have demonstrated proof that existing approaches are not working.
let's unpack:
1. what counts as proof?
2. what counts as failure?
3. not working for whom?
4. not working towards what end?
in order to answer this one needs to understand a thing well enough to know what success looks like and to know what failure modes exist.
the most relevant group, obviously, are people currently involved in working in/on/with/through (prepositions lol) the thing.
also relevant however are people who might become directly involved in the future. the over-the-horizon growth potential.
this is part of the necessary context. systems are a means to an end. if the system either cannot clearly define its ends, or defines unobtainable ends, it is incoherent.
More from Life
Today is a day to celebrate love in our lives.
And here at ACLU-MA, we know that justice is a labor of love. Here are some of our favorite moments of love and justice in the last year, to brighten your #ValentinesDay.
💞👇💞
Almost exactly a year ago, our clients Hanz and Maudy were reunited after being separated by the cruel "Return to Mexico" policy.
And here at ACLU-MA, we know that justice is a labor of love. Here are some of our favorite moments of love and justice in the last year, to brighten your #ValentinesDay.
💞👇💞
Almost exactly a year ago, our clients Hanz and Maudy were reunited after being separated by the cruel "Return to Mexico" policy.
Yesterday, a family of asylum seekers were reunited. Hanz & his son were subjected to #MPP, a cruel policy that forced them into dangerous cities in northern Mexico. We sued on their behalf, allowing them to rejoin their family in Massachusetts. pic.twitter.com/Kce6MTpS9C
— ACLU Massachusetts (@ACLU_Mass) February 7, 2020