Dreams in the first quarter(पहर) of the day give result in one year, if the dreams are in the second quarter(प्रहर) the results are in eight months, for third the dreams are fulfilled in three months,
MEANING, EXPLANATION & INTERPRETATION OF YOUR DREAMS, ALSO ITS EFFECTS IN COMING DAYS
Sigmund Freud had explained the interpretation of dreams in the last century, but our scriptures explained this thousands of years back. What is the significance and meaning of our dreams.
Dreams in the first quarter(पहर) of the day give result in one year, if the dreams are in the second quarter(प्रहर) the results are in eight months, for third the dreams are fulfilled in three months,
If you dream during your tense and worrisome period those are never realized. People with Negative traits never get their dreams fulfilled.
You will gain wealth if you see the following things in your dream- cow,elephant, horse, palace, climbing mountains or trees,
You will attain more land if you see someone
singing with veena in his hands.
You will attain amrit if you see yourself entering a red sea or entering into narak.
If you see yourself in iron chains you will attain fame or a son.
You are about to become a King or a leader if you dream and see a broken leaf with curd.
If you are in pain or see a monkey, fish, pearl, conch, diamond, blood, chandan, creepers and mango in a dream, you will be rich.
If you see a statue or a shivling then you will be victorious in your endeavor.
If you see Sun and Moon you will remain healthy.
If you see a smiling Brahmin lady coming to your house you will be getting something that you immensely like.
If someone gives you a flower in your hand you will get the Punya of tirth Snan.
If you see yourself donating something to a Brahmin you will be wealthy.
You will be a great scholar if you dream of a eight year old child or see anybody giving you a book or a mother/ father teaching you,
You will attain a mantra siddhi if someone whispers mantra in your ear in your dream.
Someone giving you a white grain in dreams makes you a King.
Seeing a dream of well, pond, lake white mountain and white snakes makes you rich.
The Brahmin that you see in dreams is actually a swaroop of Shiv and Vishnu. Brahmini is Laxmi or Parvati swaroop. Radha comes as gwalin and children are Bal gopal.
Instagram link👇
https://t.co/l3vxrVadGj
Facebook page link👇
https://t.co/zXjYSQKZrK
Source - Brahma Vaivartva puran
https://t.co/W2jnWlziJC
https://t.co/HTVb4OrefP
#\u0936\u093e\u0938\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u094b\u0902_\u092e\u0948\u0902_\u0938\u092a\u0928\u094b\u0902_\u0915\u093e_\u092e\u0939\u0924\u094d\u0935
— \u092a\u0902\u0921\u093f\u0924 \u0935\u093f\u0936\u093e\u0932 \u0936\u094d\u0930\u094b\u0924\u094d\u0930\u093f\u092f (@VishalS50533075) February 16, 2021
\u0938\u093f\u0917\u092e\u0902\u0921 \u092b\u094d\u0930\u093e\u092f\u0921 \u0928\u0947 \u092a\u093f\u091b\u0932\u0940 \u0938\u0926\u0940 \u092e\u0947\u0902 \u0938\u092a\u0928\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u0940 \u0935\u094d\u092f\u093e\u0916\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0915\u0940 \u0925\u0940, \u0932\u0947\u0915\u093f\u0928 \u0939\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0947 \u0936\u093e\u0938\u094d\u0924\u094d\u0930\u094b\u0902 \u0928\u0947 \u0939\u091c\u093e\u0930\u094b\u0902 \u0938\u093e\u0932 \u092a\u0939\u0932\u0947 \u0907\u0938\u0947 \u0938\u092e\u091d\u093e\u092f\u093e \u0925\u093e\u0964 \u0939\u092e\u093e\u0930\u0947 \u0938\u092a\u0928\u094b\u0902 \u0915\u093e \u092e\u0939\u0924\u094d\u0935 \u0914\u0930 \u0905\u0930\u094d\u0925 \u0915\u094d\u092f\u093e \u0939\u0948\u0964 pic.twitter.com/aWBTCAmrpI
More from Anshul Pandey
More from Life
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
1/OK, data mystery time.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
This New York Times feature shows China with a Gini Index of less than 30, which would make it more equal than Canada, France, or the Netherlands. https://t.co/g3Sv6DZTDE
That's weird. Income inequality in China is legendary.
Let's check this number.
2/The New York Times cites the World Bank's recent report, "Fair Progress? Economic Mobility across Generations Around the World".
The report is available here:
3/The World Bank report has a graph in which it appears to show the same value for China's Gini - under 0.3.
The graph cites the World Development Indicators as its source for the income inequality data.
4/The World Development Indicators are available at the World Bank's website.
Here's the Gini index: https://t.co/MvylQzpX6A
It looks as if the latest estimate for China's Gini is 42.2.
That estimate is from 2012.
5/A Gini of 42.2 would put China in the same neighborhood as the U.S., whose Gini was estimated at 41 in 2013.
I can't find the <30 number anywhere. The only other estimate in the tables for China is from 2008, when it was estimated at 42.8.
