1)When did it become a crime for The People to enter The People’s House?

The next question is: Who was it that actually broke laws?

2)Seems to me that the Elitists calling yesterday’s protestors “law breakers” had no problem calling those who burned and looted cities (including DC) in 2020 “peaceful” and “justified”... and protected them from prosecution.
3)
As it was with all those mayors and politicians in 2020, it’s only when they are directly confronted by the People they pissed off that they call for “law and order” and start making arrests.
4) We are now being told that the “why” doesn’t matter (though it did in Portland and elsewhere to excuse that violence).
5) An Election was rigged and the Vote, the actual, tangible thing that enshrines and documents the Consent of the Governed, which is the foundation of all laws and permissions to govern, has been nullified.
6) At what point do “The People” regain the right to self governance and say “enough”?
7) Or do we just allow these political parties to do as they please, when the last line of defense, the peaceful redress of grievances available to them, the Vote, is no longer secure or listened to?
8) Whether it was Trump supporters, Antifa types masquerading as Trumpers (both methinks) that started the “breech”, the responsibility for what happened yesterday belongs to those within the Capitol Building, not without.

-Michael Bohr, CI

More from Legal

Last night TPD arrested and charged two known organizers, @DailyTacoma and our own @ohdamn_jam.

So many people acted quickly, and we were able to make sure they both made bail.


You can read @ohdamn_jam's account of what happened here


If you remember, back in August we were made aware that Pierce County diverted COVID funds to monitor us. We know for sure they monitored and reported on this account and anyone associated with it, such as @DailyTacoma

Side note: They were not read their rights until munch later.
More severe police injuries and deaths on that one day of rampaging Trumpers than in five years of Anti-Police protests.


You can tell a lot about the stance of a angry crowd by whether they come with shields or pitchforks.

If people protesting police brutality for years had wanted to use their large numbers to attack, maim and kill police, they damn well could have.

But they came to resist police.

Which is completely different.

Why did the police suffer more at the hands of those who claimed to support them and waved their flags than at the hands of those who think they should be defunded or abolished?

Because one group is literally arguing for human dignity and the other glorifies violence.

The people who uncritically support police brutality are those who believe that instrumental violence should be a standard tool in response to those standing opposed to you.

Once you accept that... WHO is standing opposed to you doesn't matter much.

You May Also Like