I must disclose this to you all.
#TataSons
Supreme Court resumes hearing in the Tata Sons v Cyrus Mistry case.
Day 4 of the arguments.
Mistry's counsel C A Sundaram, Senior Advocate, making submissions.
I must disclose this to you all.
#TataSons
CJI : So can we record no objection.
Salve : Yes.
#TataSons #CyrusMistry
#TataSons #CyrusMistry
C A Sundaram : Most young lawyers appear for companies of Tata group or SPG.
In England, there have been instances where sons have appeared before their fathers.
CJI : Justice P N Bhagwati has done that.
#TataSons #SupremeCourt #CyrusMistry
@tatatrusts
@TataCompanies
#TataSons #SupremeCourt #CyrusMistry
@tatatrusts
@TataCompanies
Sundaram : 28 years. Cyrus Mistry is 52 and Rata Tata is 81.
@RNTata2000
#TataSons #SupremeCourt #CyrusMistry
#TataSons #SupremeCourt #CyrusMistry
#TataSons #SupremeCourt #CyrusMistry
"It was in personal capacity", he adds
#TataSons
"Our experience of private companies is that there is a 'pater familias' figure acting like a head of family, asking for information from others"
#TataSons #CyrusMistry
'What is wrong in the head of family asking for information in a family run company?', CJI asks.
#TataSons #CyrusMistry
If the company was meant to be family run, it should have remained that way and should not have gone public, Sundaram adds.
#TataSons #CyrusMistry
#TataSons #CyrusMistry
#TataSons #CyrusMistry
More from Live Law
More from Law
This issue was repeatedly highlighted bu Judge Totenberg:
Dominion’s system “does not produce a voter-verifiable paper ballot or a paper ballot marked with the voter’s choices in a format readable by the voter because the votes are tabulated solely from the unreadable QR code.”
Judge also found that Dominion's QR codes are NOT encrypted:
“Evidence plainly contradicts any contention that the QR codes or digital signatures are encrypted,”
This was “ultimately conceded by Mr. Cobb and expressly acknowledged later by Dr. Coomer during his testimony.”
Judge Totenberg said there was “demonstrable evidence” that the implementation of Dominion’s systems by Georgia placed voters at an “imminent risk of deprivation of their fundamental right to cast an effective vote,” which she defined as a “vote that is accurately counted.”
Judge Totenberg found that Dominion Systems inherently could not be audited.
She noted that auditors are severely limited and “can only determine whether the BMD printout was tabulated accurately, not whether the election outcome is correct.“
Totenberg stated in her ruling that a BMD printout “is not trustworthy” and the application of an Risk-Limiting audit (RLA) to an election that used BMD printouts “does not yield a true risk-limiting audit.”
Georgia used RLAs to claim no fraud...
Dominion’s system “does not produce a voter-verifiable paper ballot or a paper ballot marked with the voter’s choices in a format readable by the voter because the votes are tabulated solely from the unreadable QR code.”
Witness explaining that on electronic ballots (QR code ballots), it's impossible to determine voter intent. The machine decides the intent, whereas, with paper ballots, a human can double-check the ballot. https://t.co/kkhamio2Je
— The Election Wizard (@Wizard_Predicts) December 30, 2020
Judge also found that Dominion's QR codes are NOT encrypted:
“Evidence plainly contradicts any contention that the QR codes or digital signatures are encrypted,”
This was “ultimately conceded by Mr. Cobb and expressly acknowledged later by Dr. Coomer during his testimony.”
Judge Totenberg said there was “demonstrable evidence” that the implementation of Dominion’s systems by Georgia placed voters at an “imminent risk of deprivation of their fundamental right to cast an effective vote,” which she defined as a “vote that is accurately counted.”
Judge Totenberg found that Dominion Systems inherently could not be audited.
She noted that auditors are severely limited and “can only determine whether the BMD printout was tabulated accurately, not whether the election outcome is correct.“
Totenberg stated in her ruling that a BMD printout “is not trustworthy” and the application of an Risk-Limiting audit (RLA) to an election that used BMD printouts “does not yield a true risk-limiting audit.”
Georgia used RLAs to claim no fraud...
