Javascript projects (beginner and intermediate), tools, resources, books!!🎈✨
Compiled all of it in one thread👇

📌Beginner Level Projects
https://t.co/Ht54zILvh4
📌Intermediate Level projects
https://t.co/XLqexU6EpM
📌HTML & CSS Projects
https://t.co/FER4CAzP9N
📌Resources and Tools
https://t.co/D6dgxPNSoo
📌Websites
https://t.co/O9d9ue9LxP
📌Blogging sites, extensions, Ides, and a lot more:)
https://t.co/gUeGuwEV53
If you find these threads useful then do follow me @swastika0015😋🌻

We can discuss about:
Web Development
Content writing: Tech/Non-Tech
Building Audience and Networking

More from Javascript

Hey folks, just want to remind you of the 40% off deal going on at https://t.co/He56i6S4yS. Here's a thread of what some folks have said about it recently:

https://t.co/6xJthkhc88


https://t.co/AJqzs3Am3q


https://t.co/ACiOF5uDuu


https://t.co/LQcz3jh1i8

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?