
Thread on #NiftyIT and Tech stocks.
Trend is down now.
Will add more charts here.

More from Shivaji Vitthalrao🇮🇳
105 is key, Bulls might defend for the time being. Once they fail during any downtrend Boy Bulls will be in serious trouble.
First targets 90-95 and worst case 65-70 (This i wil review later) https://t.co/RYaMwRQb7e

Angle 2 -- On Log scale its end of this upmove from March 2020.
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) August 24, 2021
No major support until 90-92.
Conclusion - any rise to 123-128 is a sell opportunity
Bullish only above 145. Personally not bulish.
Potential taregts on downside are 105-90#SAIL pic.twitter.com/yZv2WXwIMU
Copper break below 4.43 qualify as bearish Flag and pole
HINDCOPPER break below 157 qualify as bearish Flag n pole.
Impact copper can test 4.28-4.20
HINDCOPPER can test 150-141 as per pattern targets.
165-166 Lakshman Rekha.
Quiz - Hindcopper
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) June 9, 2021
What pattern do you see?
whats the confirmation level and impact ?
Both are interlinked. https://t.co/0gVaRXd4pS pic.twitter.com/Bbs1rdaOWf
Below 336 I see 275 in few months as long as its trading below 388 on closing basis CMP 351. https://t.co/iMRpbTfOpU

Your analysis and sl saved my time and some bucks otherwise I would've lost much bigger amount,
— lavish gadia (@gadia_lavish) August 10, 2021
Can you share your views on praj industry @shivaji_1983
More from Infylongterm
You May Also Like
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".