#BankNifty -- Blue TL Resistance at 35700-780
Gap area Resistance 34797-35130
Let the index cross Blue line to end this correction. Did the same last 2 times.
Crossing Red Lines triggers fresh rally. Today Index managed to cross yday high
33.9k Key Play the move step by step
More from Shivaji Vitthalrao🇮🇳
Retest of support at 700-710 is a great opportunity cmp 761+
Potential target 1000-1300-1500 in next 1-1.5 year
It has Pole & Flag pattern on multiyear log scale which gives a taget of 2000+ and more over next 3-4 years https://t.co/aCDDcGVqOc
Yes please @shivaji_1983 sir. Share your chart view on MAITHAN ALLOYS
— Anushka (@AnushkaDas28) June 1, 2021
Longs Alert take care. Stock looks weak to me below 135.
#hindcopper https://t.co/hnXBWmcPEX
Hindcopper unable to cross 158 and required bullish momentum missing.
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) August 9, 2021
Closing below 135 is weak signal.
Would like to wait n watch before commenting further on this stock.
Dosc: Holding "NO Longs" in this stock. https://t.co/qGAnigXBB7
155-175 Major support and also retest of breakout.
275-220 Probabable targets in medium term.
#PRAJIND https://t.co/dsbj25WPbQ
Thanks. Praj Industries perfect smart distribution. More weakness below 336. Rise to 355-365 can face selling pressure.
— Shivaji Vitthalrao\U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 (@shivaji_1983) August 10, 2021
Below 336 I see 275 in few months as long as its trading below 388 on closing basis CMP 351. https://t.co/iMRpbTfOpU pic.twitter.com/mKwgDwreaU
More from Banknifty
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?