On December 29 we were dillucidating here if the drops meant "surprise, relatively neutral expression" or "a negative expression, horror" (Remember: https://t.co/J2gjQjAENw ). Well, December 22 drops seem to clarify it. First, the December 29 drop that generated the confusion 1/*

didn't appear in today drops, while several old ones have been posted again. I would say that all December 22 drops regarding facial expression mean and clarify "surprise". 2/*
More 3/*
And more. So, they didn't point to a negative event, just to one that generates surprise. 4/*
All these drops were completed with a Christmas gift one, confirming the surprise neutral meaning and adding a related positive one connected to the surprise. 5/*
Hours before all this, he droped the following drops, I would say clearly realted to the thread "Countdown 3, 2, 1" I created a few days ago (Remember: https://t.co/lJ9FpgT8yx ) 6/*
So confirming that 3 and 2 drops were pointing to a countdown. And I would say probably meaning that the countdown points to the reset. I said that if a "1" was posted at some point it could indicate a near reset event. Well, he posted it. 7/*
As that day there is a Christmas gift post, it could mean price increase, but also could indicate a date, the surprising event could take place in Dec 25 (Friday, fits the day expected for a reset), which fits the "1" drop, dropped 2 days before the event. 8/*
Finally we have to analyze the 3 sleeping images dropped in December 22. They could fit in the "overnight" aspect of the reset theory, the reset will happen just in a single night (Friday night) or a near short period (Friday to Monday). 9/*
Or they could just mean "Ei guys, sleep well, don't give a fuck about SEC's FUD". Remember, he anticipated a lawsuit on December 16 drop. 10/*
The don't give a fuck theory is corroborated with December 9 drops. There will be a fall (Buy more haha, just bought 333 XRP). 11/*
And the FUD/news will seem a very huge bad ones. 12/*
But in fact people makes it bigger than it is. 13/*
Because at the end it will be near to nothing (this drop is one of the 3 collapsing drops: the big white ball just posted is another one and the fall risk caution sing the other one). 14/*
So, surprise on December 25 (reset?), followed by a gift (price increase?) and sleep well (SEC's FUD will be nothing?). 15/*
Quod erat demonstrandum. 16/* @looP_rM311_7211
@threadreaderapp unroll

More from Enigma

XRP's death. Is XRP dying? 1/*


XRP is also known as the Phoenix, see Ripple's office. 2/*


What's the Phoenix? A bird that cyclically regenerates and it's associated with the Sun. A phoenix obtains new life by arising from the ashes of its predecessor (SWIFT). Read the link:
https://t.co/jIxANatetR 3/*.

Lately we're seeing a lot of SURPRISED faces in Mr.Pool drops. See what August 15 decrypted message says about the Phoenix, the storm and SURPRISES: "As the storm comes to a SURPRISING and unexpected halt, and the clouds clear out to your own SURPRISE". 4/*


So, if XRP is the Phoenix maybe it has to die before it reborns. Reset. XRP's death -or a big fall- alone, or death combined with reborn could cause such a surprise described in Mr. Pool drops. 5/*

More from Health

I applaud the #EUCancerPlan *BUT* caution: putting #meat 🥩 (a nourishing, evolutionary food) in the same box as 🚬 to solve a contemporary health challenge, would be basing policy on assumptions rather than robust data.

#FollowTheScience yes, but not just part of it!
THREAD👇


1/ Granted, some studies have pointed to ASSOCIATIONS of HIGH intake of red & processed meats with (slightly!) increased colorectal cancer incidence. Also, @WHO/IARC is often mentioned in support (usually hyperbolically so).

But, let’s have a closer look at all this! 🔍


2/ First, meat being “associated” with cancer is very different from stating that meat CAUSES cancer.

Unwarranted use of causal language is widespread in nutritional sciences, posing a systemic problem & undermining credibility.

3/ That’s because observational data are CONFOUNDED (even after statistical adjustment).

Healthy user bias is a major problem. Healthy middle classes are TOLD to eat less red meat (due to historical rather than rational reasons, cf link). So, they

4/ What’s captured here is sociology, not physiology.

Health-focused Westerners eat less red meat, whereas those who don’t adhere to dietary advice tend to have unhealthier lifestyles.

That tells us very little about meat AS SUCH being responsible for disease.

You May Also Like