THREAD - Doctors want to fix “surprise bills” more accurately called unpaid insurer bills but today’s “agreement” is NOT the right fix for patients

It’s just a big boost to insurer profits & will shutter independent physician practices & rural hospitals!

1/x

The Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) in this compromise directs arbiter to consider “in network median rates” when settling disputes which is a sham arbitration & tantamount to benchmarking aka rate setting

Who dictates in network rates?

Insurers!

2/x
This bill prohibits use of charge data (aka usual & customary) which is another way of saying doctors must accept whatever poor contract terms or low balled payment offers insurers are jamming down their throats

This is just giving more power to profitable insurers

3/x
The reason why arbitration works in states like NY, TX is that it levels playing field, directs arbiters to consider independent price database like @FAIRHealth that can’t be manipulated by either side

Insurers have total control over “median in network” rates w their monopolies
When insurers have control over terms of arbitration, they will do everything in their power to do what any respectable publicly traded corporation will do: tilt the terms in their favor to increase profits

5/x

https://t.co/NfgMrWNoq5
In CA, insurers started terminating contracts with physician groups overnight to drive down in network median rates

Independent practices had to shutter their doors or join large health systems to survive. Consolidation drives up costs! Rural areas were hit hardest.

6/x
When out of network payments are tied to in network rates, there is literally no option for providers to fight back against unfair take it or leave it contracts that insurers design to ⬆️ profits

Tying arbitration to “median in network” rates gives insurers ALL the leverage

7/
We need to model federal bill like NYS where IDR is fair & based on charges

“From 2015-2018, the Out of Network Law saved NY more than $400 mil in emergency services, reduced out-of-network billing by 34%, lowered in-network ED physician payments by 9%”

https://t.co/HhqkTkB4Fe
NYS surprise bill law has not caused any physician shortages as opposed to huge shortage exacerbated in CA

NY’s surprise bill saved consumers $400 mil per @NYGovCuomo @NYDFS

In CA consumer complaints re access to care skyrocketed after benchmarking implemented

9/x
Insurers even love the NY law. They even personally endorsed the law!

10/x
Remember Congress has a bill modeled after successful NY law that has a fair IDR

HR3502 by @DrPhilRoe @Dr_RaulRuiz already has 110 cosponsors but House and Senate leadership continues to ignore!

11/x

https://t.co/c7t6qnsuXJ
In conclusion, doctors want an end to unpaid insurer bills aka ‘surprise’ bills ASAP

This agreement though is unacceptable - benefits insurers only & will crush independent practices & rural hospitals. Will drive consolidation, ⬆️ cost, exacerbate access to care problems

12/x
We need to fix “surprise medical bills” the right way with a fresh start in January

@SenSchumer @SpeakerPelosi @senatemajldr @RepKevinBrady @RepRichardNeal

/end
👆🚨 @EdLaborCmte
@EdLaborGOP
@BobbyScott
@GOPHELP
@SenateHELP
@SenateFinance
@SenFinance
@SenateApprops
@WaysMeansCmte
@EnergyCommerce
@WaysAndMeansGOP
@HouseCommerce
@AppropsDems
@HouseAppropsGOP
@HouseBudgetDems
@HouseBudgetGOP
@HouseGOP
@HouseDemocrats
@WhipClyburn
👆🚨 @LeaderHoyer
@GOPLeader
@senatemajldr
@SenJohnThune
@SenJohnBarrasso
@SpeakerPelosi
@SenSchumer
@LeaderHoyer
@WhipClyburn
@SenatorDurbin
@PattyMurray
@SenStabenow
@amyklobuchar
@VP
@realDonaldTrump
@ChuckGrassley
@RepJeffries

More from Health

1/16
Why do B12 and folate deficiencies lead to HUGE red blood cells?

And, if the issue is DNA synthesis, why are red blood cells (which don't have DNA) the key cell line affected?

For answers, we'll have to go back a few billion years.


2/
RNA came first. Then, ~3-4 billion years ago, DNA emerged.

Among their differences:
🔹RNA contains uracil
🔹DNA contains thymine

But why does DNA contains thymine (T) instead of uracil (U)?

https://t.co/XlxT6cLLXg


3/
🔑Cytosine (C) can undergo spontaneous deamination to uracil (U).

In the RNA world, this meant that U could appear intensionally or unintentionally. This is clearly problematic. How can you repair RNA when you can't tell if something is an error?

https://t.co/bIZGviHBUc


4/
DNA's use of T instead of U means that spontaneous C → U deamination can be corrected without worry that an intentional U is being removed.

DNA requires greater stability than RNA so the transition to a thymine-based structure was beneficial.

https://t.co/bIZGviHBUc


5/
Let's return to megaloblastic anemia secondary to B12 or folate deficiency.

When either is severely deficient deoxythymidine monophosphate (dTMP*) production is hindered. With less dTMP, DNA synthesis is abnormal.

[*Note: thymine is the base in dTMP]

https://t.co/AnDUtKkbZh
🚨Important changes to lockdown/self-isolation regulations from 5pm

The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (All Tiers and Self-Isolation) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2021

£800 'house party' FPN & police can now access track & trace data

https://t.co/k9XCpVsXhC


“Large gathering offence”

As trailed by Home Secretary last week there is now a fixed penalty notice of £800 (or £400 if you pay within 14 days) for participating in an gathering of over 15 people in a private residence


Fixed Penalty Notices double for each subsequent “large gathering offence” up to £6,400

Compare:
- Ordinary fixed penalty notice is £200 or £100 if paid in 14 days
- Holding or being involved in the holding of a gathering of over 30 people is £10,000


Second big change:

Since September has been a legal requirement to sell-isolate if you test positive/notified by Track & Trace of exposure to someone else who tested positive

Police can now be given access to NHS Track & Trace data if for the purpose of enforcement/prosecution


This will make it easier for police to enforce people breaking self-isolation rules. Currently there has been practically no enforcement.

Data says only a small proportion of people meant to be self-isolating are fully doing so.

You May Also Like