My last #tweetorial focused on the GCS. Now let's look at another hugely important clinical window into the brain: the pupil. What does a 'blown pupil' really imply? What about small fixed pupils? To understand this, we need to see how pupil size is governed. #FOAMed 1/20

The pupil has two functions, constriction and dilation, both under autonomic control. Sympathetics dilate the pupil and open the eyelid - easy to remember, because in 'fight or flight' mode, maximum information needs to get in to keep you alive. 2/20
By contrast, constriction is parasympathetic. Its main function is to regulate the amount of light on the retina, so in response to high light intensity (like a pen torch), both pupils constrict. 3/20
These parasympathetics have a straightforward course (literally). They hitchhike on the third nerve, which runs forward from the midbrain to the orbit to supply most of the extraocular muscles and eyelid. As they're superficial, they're vulnerable to extrinsic compression. 4/20
Plenty of things can compress the third nerve and produce mydriasis (a dilated pupil) - most classically a posterior communicating artery aneurysm. But in the context of an acutely comatose patient, it suggests something worrying: 'uncal herniation'. Why is this? 5/20
Here's the uncus (red). It's the lowest, most medial part of the temporal lobe, right on the skull base. See how close it is to the third nerve (yellow), and the cerebral peduncle (white, bringing the motor fibres down to the other side of the body) 6/20
When you have raised intracranial pressure, or an enlarging intracranial mass lesion like a haematoma over the hemisphere, you can see how the uncus might press down on these structures. The result - blown pupil, contralateral weakness and coma from brainstem compression. 7/20
So a blown pupil is a failure of parasympathetic pupilloconstriction allowing unchallenged sympathetic dilation. What about when sympathetic control of the pupil fails? This causes miosis, or a constricted pupil. 8/20
Horner's syndrome. "Miosis, ptosis, anhydrosis… Miosis, ptosis, anhydrosis"... The sympathetics have a frustratingly long course, but understanding it helps you get your head around the clinical picture and causes of a Horner's. 9/20
The pupillary sympathetics start in the hypothalamus, with input from the cerebral hemisphere. They descend in the cord, where they exit in the T1 root. They then ascend in the sympathetic chain, hitchhiking on the internal carotid back into the head again and to the pupil. 10/20
A lesion anywhere along this path affects the fibres to the pupil and the eyelid, so you ALWAYS get miosis and ptosis. But as sweat sympathetics to the upper forequarter of the body leave at various points, the degree of anhydrosis varies… 11/20
CNS problems like haemorrhage/trauma affecting the descending fibres in the brain/brainstem/cervical cord cause miosis, ptosis, and anhydrosis to the face, neck, arm and chest on that side.

The classical example is pontine haemorrhage - deep coma and pinpoint pupils. 12/20
If the problem is affecting the lower sympathetic chain, the fibres to the arm and chest have already left - there will be anhydrosis to the face only. The most worrying cause is a Pancoast tumour of the lung affecting the T1 root. 13/20
Moving further along the pathway, there are problems higher up like internal carotid dissections or skull base tumours. All the sweat sympathetics have branched off by now, so there is miosis and ptosis only! 14/20
For me, this structure serves mostly to think systematically about the causes of Horner's, what other features/symptoms to think about, and which investigations might be most appropriate. But if you really want to check for anhydrosis - try a spoon! 15/20 https://t.co/pvicME0Pfr
Anyway, importantly, third nerve palsy causes ptosis with dilated pupil; Horner's causes ptosis with constricted pupil. So the size of the pupil - or the laterality of the ptosis - becomes essential to knowing which pathology is at play. 16/20
Never forget that opiates cause small pupils, and pupils are physiologically small in old age, and in infancy. They should still be reactive, but in small pupils this is very hard to appreciate. 17/20
Finally, there are couple of locations where pathology can affect both parasympathetics and sympathetics together. One is the midbrain, where the third nerves come out anteriorly whilst the sympathetics descend towards T1. Compression here can cause a midsized, fixed pupil. 18/20
The other place is the cavernous sinus, where the third nerve parasympathetics and the internal carotid sympathetics happen to run together to the orbit. A midsized, fixed pupil in a swollen, painful eye with restricted movements can occur with cavernous sinus syndrome. 19/20
I hope this helps to demonstrate how much information you can get from examining the pupils. There are other pupillary disturbances - but at the very least, thinking about pupil size in this anatomical way can help to make a confusing area a little more structured. Thanks! 20/20

More from Health

You gotta think about this one carefully!

Imagine you go to the doctor and get tested for a rare disease (only 1 in 10,000 people get it.)

The test is 99% effective in detecting both sick and healthy people.

Your test comes back positive.

Are you really sick? Explain below 👇

The most complete answer from every reply so far is from Dr. Lena. Thanks for taking the time and going through


You can get the answer using Bayes' theorem, but let's try to come up with it in a different —maybe more intuitive— way.

👇


Here is what we know:

- Out of 10,000 people, 1 is sick
- Out of 100 sick people, 99 test positive
- Out of 100 healthy people, 99 test negative

Assuming 1 million people take the test (including you):

- 100 of them are sick
- 999,900 of them are healthy

👇

Let's now test both groups, starting with the 100 people sick:

▫️ 99 of them will be diagnosed (correctly) as sick (99%)

▫️ 1 of them is going to be diagnosed (incorrectly) as healthy (1%)

👇

You May Also Like

So the cryptocurrency industry has basically two products, one which is relatively benign and doesn't have product market fit, and one which is malignant and does. The industry has a weird superposition of understanding this fact and (strategically?) not understanding it.


The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.

This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.

The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."

This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.