Thread on how atheism leads to mental retardation (backed with medical citations🧵💉)

To start with, atheism is an unnatural self-contradicting doctrine.

Medical terminology proves that human beings are naturally pre-disposed to believe in God. Oxford scientists assert that people are "born believers".

https://t.co/kE0Fi588yn
https://t.co/OqyXcGIMJn
It should be known that atheism could never produce an intelligently-functioning society and neither ever will.

Contrastingly, Islam produced several intellectuals & polymaths, was on the forefront of scientific development, boasting 100% literacy rates.

https://t.co/IHixP6D5AU
It is also scientifically proven that atheism led to lesser scientific curiosity and scientific frauds, which is also why atheists incline to pseudo-science.

Whereas, religion in general and Islam in particular boosted education.

https://t.co/19Onc84u3g
Atheists are also likely to affected by pervasive mental and developmental disorders like high-functioning autism.

Cognitive Scientists and renowned Neurologists found that more atheism is leads to greater autism.

https://t.co/zRjEyFoX3P
Highly intelligent people tend to be open-minded and have scientific curiosity.

Whereas, research indicated that atheists tend to be less open-minded and show greater intolerance to contradiction when their beliefs are challenged.

https://t.co/KRZNldiE8B
Religion also has neuroanatomical effects like thicker cerebral cortices & a greater ability to fight depression.

Atheism on the other hand has the highest suicide rates, a direct result of poor mental welfare.

https://t.co/YBk7VBgDQ6
Atheism also leads to lower IQs, a survey found that people who practice their religion by visiting religious institutions on a regular basis, tend to have higher IQs than atheists/irreligious people.

Source: Theodre Beale, General Social Survey (1972-2012)
Atheism also leads to an extremely low Emotional Quotient (EQ).

Atheists have a higher rate of having emotional problems when they disbelieve in God, whereas religiosity is positively associated with emotional intelligence.

https://t.co/L7hYG9UyOY
https://t.co/xehjeJ9Tmm
Atheists are also more likely to be evil psychopaths & criminals.

Science tells us that atheism is positively related to criminal traits which is why most of the mass-murderers historically were atheists.

https://t.co/vRTCth1ja9
Moreover, mental issues is a natural product of atheism.

Believing in God leads to better mental health. While countries like China (world's largest atheistic society) faces the highest number of Alzheimer's & Dementia cases.

https://t.co/UcflNU67Su
https://t.co/0obLKzsA5h
While religious beliefs have logical explanations using logical propositions, atheism has no rationale (is an acquired blunder as (i) explains)

Moreover, atheists are much more likely to believe in pseudo-science and superstition.

https://t.co/fDWo9jlmhV
https://t.co/kNfSI8DJZg
And what will be the fate of atheism?

Scientifically atheism will never survive, because they’re at a biological disadvantage.

In contrast, Islam will outshine other religions, whereas atheism is bound to extinct.
https://t.co/jYFp1vhmA6
https://t.co/tXUSkGPi5i

🧵

More from Health

Public Health Scholarships

This may help for those considering MS/PhD in Public Health

1. The Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degree in Public Health in Disasters
https://t.co/1Z5qpstsSu

2. Afya Bora Global Health

3. Carl Duisberg Scholarships

https://t.co/HnNXdbWBxy

4. Commonwealth Scholarships for Developing Countries

https://t.co/3fWGf5b2OH

5. Fellowships in Public Health & Tropical

6. Fellowships to Promote Mental Health Journalism

https://t.co/MVV9PFsBJ1

7. 2021-22 Jeroen Ensink Memorial Fund

8. Paul S. Lietman Global Travel Grant for Residents & Fellows

https://t.co/qK76R495QT

9. Global Health Internships and Funding

https://t.co/FD9Gh2wXvO

10. Kofi Annan Global Health Leadership

11. MA in European Public Health

https://t.co/5x0Vr7b1j8

12. MSc in Public Health Scholarships - Maastricht University,
Some thoughts on this: Firstly, it might be personal preference, but I am not keen on this kind of campaign as I feel like it trivialises cancer. Sometimes the serious message gets lost because people are sharing pics of cats or whatever and the important context is gone.


More importantly, the statistic being used in the campaign is misleading. It says 57% of women put off cervical screening if they can't get waxed. But on further investigation, that's not accurate.

The page here goes on to say "57% of women who regularly have their pubic hair professionally removed would put off attending their cervical screening appointment if they hadn’t been able to visit a beauty salon."

So the 57% represents a concern not across the whole population of women, but only those who regularly get waxed. So how big of an issue is this across the whole population? And what else is stopping people getting smears?

I think campaigns for cancer screening are really tricky because there is so much nuance that often doesn't fit into a catchy headline or hashtag. It's certainly not easy and is part of a bigger conversation.
Now you know I love to sh-t in Harvard. But I also like accuracy. So I decided to go look at Harvard’s catalog to see its lack of military history that this article describes (they only teach history of pets it claims) and what I found shocked me! Shocked me! A thread: 1/


First off, Harvard students literally have multiple sections of military history that they can take listed. (It appears these ones are taught at MIT, so they might have to walk down the street for these) but... 2/


Say they want to stay on campus...they can only take numerous classes on war and diplomacy...3/


They have an entire class on Yalta. That’s right. An entire class on Yalta. 4/


But wait! There is more! They can take the British Empire, The Fall of the Roman Empire for those wanting traditional topics... 5/

You May Also Like

Nano Course On Python For Trading
==========================
Module 1

Python makes it very easy to analyze and visualize time series data when you’re a beginner. It's easier when you don't have to install python on your PC (that's why it's a nano course, you'll learn python...

... on the go). You will not be required to install python in your PC but you will be using an amazing python editor, Google Colab Visit
https://t.co/EZt0agsdlV

This course is for anyone out there who is confused, frustrated, and just wants this python/finance thing to work!

In Module 1 of this Nano course, we will learn about :

# Using Google Colab
# Importing libraries
# Making a Random Time Series of Black Field Research Stock (fictional)

# Using Google Colab

Intro link is here on YT: https://t.co/MqMSDBaQri

Create a new Notebook at https://t.co/EZt0agsdlV and name it AnythingOfYourChoice.ipynb

You got your notebook ready and now the game is on!
You can add code in these cells and add as many cells as you want

# Importing Libraries

Imports are pretty standard, with a few exceptions.
For the most part, you can import your libraries by running the import.
Type this in the first cell you see. You need not worry about what each of these does, we will understand it later.