Let's establish a few facts about cefepime:
🔺4th generation cephalosporin antibiotic
🔺Excretion = exclusively in the urine (mostly as unchanged drug)
🔺Readily crosses the blood-brain barrier (so it easily accesses the brain)
https://t.co/rjYG1BfGPR
1/15
Why can cefepime cause neurological toxicity?
And why is renal failure the main risk factor for this complication?
The answer requires us to learn about cefepime's structure and why it unexpectedly binds to a certain CNS receptor.
#MedTwitter #Tweetorial
Let's establish a few facts about cefepime:
🔺4th generation cephalosporin antibiotic
🔺Excretion = exclusively in the urine (mostly as unchanged drug)
🔺Readily crosses the blood-brain barrier (so it easily accesses the brain)
https://t.co/rjYG1BfGPR
The first report of cefepime neurotoxicity was in 1999.
A patient w/ renal failure received high doses of cefepime and then developed encephalopathy, tremors, myoclonic jerks, and tonic-clonic seizures.
✅All symptoms resolved after hemodialysis.
https://t.co/u7JLVitQpp
Cefepime neurotoxicity is surprisingly common, occurring in up to 15% of treated critically ill patients (w/ symptoms varying from encephalopathy to seizures).
💡The main risk factors = renal failure and lack of dose adjustment for renal function.
https://t.co/nxbnzSq8AR
What about cefepime induces neurotoxicity?
One clue is that it's not the only antibiotic that causes neurotoxicity, particularly seizures.
This actually is a class effect w/ other beta-lactam antibiotics (including penicillins and carbapenems).
https://t.co/Lf4BhON9IY
Recall that beta-lactam antibiotics all share a common structural feature: a beta-lactam ring.
https://t.co/iWXweuG4Ct
A 1971 study in cats implicated beta-lactam rings as the source of neurotoxicity.
High doses of penicillin were used to induce seizures.
🔑But pre-incubation w/ the enzyme beta-lactamase (disrupts the beta-lactam ring) blocked all seizure activity.
https://t.co/M3lDiXm88N
So why can beta-lactam antibiotics like cefepime cause neurotoxicity?
It turns that they block the binding of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) to its receptor.
🔑Cephalosporins block GABA particularly effectively.
https://t.co/Eo0OlTduOE
The GABA receptor has two subtypes (A and B), and the A subtype functions as a ligand-gated Cl⁻ ion channel.
Cefepime binds to the GABA-A receptor and blocks Cl⁻ influx, which correlates with its ability to induce seizure activity.
https://t.co/l2f9QHHEEW
We've established that cefepime blocks GABA.
This induces neuro-excitation leading to seizures and other neurotoxic manifestations such as tremors and encephalopathy.
💡But why is there such a strong link with renal failure?
An obvious explanation would be that, since cefepime is renally cleared, elevated serum and CNS drug levels build up.
This is supported by the observation that cefepime and other cephalosporins block GABA in a concentration-dependent manner.
https://t.co/l2f9QHHEEW
But increased drug levels might not be the only reason that patients w/ renal failure are predisposed to neurotoxicity.
The milieu around neurons seems to matter as well.
This experiment in rat brain slices simulated a "renal" milieu by using a hyperkalemic medium around neurons.
⚡️Exposure to higher potassium levels significantly increased the ability of cefepime to induce epileptiform discharges.
https://t.co/vb3p4xXdTm
Let's ask one final question.
Why can cefepime (and other beta-lactam antibiotics) block the GABA receptor?
Exactly why hasn't been well-studied but it likely reflects sufficient structural similarity w/ GABA.
https://t.co/KN7I6ACXvb
More from Health
You May Also Like
I’m torn on how to approach the idea of luck. I’m the first to admit that I am one of the luckiest people on the planet. To be born into a prosperous American family in 1960 with smart parents is to start life on third base. The odds against my very existence are astronomical.
I’ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.
In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the person’s part, whereas “smart” luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.
So, was I “lucky” to be born when I was—nothing I had any control over—and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write “What Works on Wall Street?” Absolutely.
Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.
Ironies of Luck https://t.co/5BPWGbAxFi
— Morgan Housel (@morganhousel) March 14, 2018
"Luck is the flip side of risk. They are mirrored cousins, driven by the same thing: You are one person in a 7 billion player game, and the accidental impact of other people\u2019s actions can be more consequential than your own."
I’ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.
In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the person’s part, whereas “smart” luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.
So, was I “lucky” to be born when I was—nothing I had any control over—and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write “What Works on Wall Street?” Absolutely.
Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.
