HDFC Update
2715 📍
In Weekly; next in-line 2850.
In Monthly; Once ATH is taken out, A sight of 3000+ would be caught.
#StockMarket #StocksInFocus #HDFC https://t.co/VpM9Yvbq7l
#HDFC Daily and Weekly TF's
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) August 3, 2021
Broken past the descending trendline; A follow-up beyond '2558' would bring in 2630 initially followed by 2850.
In Monthly; Once ATH is taken out, A sight of 3000+ would be caught.
[Will open position above 2558]#StockMarket #StocksToWatch pic.twitter.com/jRukw5Yh6d
More from Gurleen
Post the Harmonic reversal, Amongst the Pharma sector; #DRREDDY is 10% down.
Strong sell-off, There's a high probability of 4874.80 getting breached. Immediate support at 4700.20
#StockMarket https://t.co/J61wgJdzX7
#CNXPHARMA
— Gurleen (@GurleenKaur_19) July 27, 2021
Strong Breakdown but it continues to hold above a crucial support level of 14183.65
Support staying intact or A slip below this level would lead the Index either side. #StockMarket pic.twitter.com/qgBZKB4Cyo
More from Hdfc
HDFC - might pull back till 2620. A good risk-reward setup with a SL below 2560. I have entered with 2.5% capital only as large caps have a tendency of slow moves. pic.twitter.com/wpdGLPPLGe
— The_Chartist \U0001f4c8 (@nison_steve) August 5, 2021
You May Also Like
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x