1. - Kashyap Patel
05/14/2018 Nunes, Gowdy accuse DOJ (Rod Rosenstein) of launching anonymous attacks on congressional investigator
Nunes: "Kash is always 2 steps ahead of the DOJ and this is why they are launching anonymous attacks on him in the
More from CodesUcq
If something "has teeth" it's effective
If it was "like pulling a tooth" it required effort to do.
Thus in comms it's used for plants working together and removal of dug-in plants.
e.g. S. Rich died July 2016
https://t.co/l9eUti2Wq9 symbolism signal
1. - Tooth Extracted Celebration Comms.
— CodesUcq (@CodesUcq) September 18, 2020
09/16/2020 Dentist Seth Lookhart extracted tooth July 2016 on hoverboard sentenced to 12 years
Note cheer after extraction in pic 3.
Does my expanding the article title give a clue as to the meaning? Yes it does.https://t.co/nOtO1DhnGy
01/06/2021 Riot decode via Youtube/Twitch
Symbolism comms allow hiding messages in plain sight, classified data updates, or signals to coordinate crimes.
e.g. I decoded a song that implied Mi6 + CIA used the Radio to coordinate the removal of JFK.
1.
— CodesUcq (@CodesUcq) March 28, 2020
I've gotten a lot of requests to decode the new 17/Q Minute Bob Dylan song about JFK's murder.
Ok.
So first up this isn't a new song except in that it's just been released. The question of why wasn't it released before is worth considering.
https://t.co/FZjO8Dm92l
12/26/2020 - Trump Deleted Tweet comms
3 Deleted tweets on the 26th with several changes.
wan to -> want to
get our -> get out -> get our
+ measly
"I simply wan to get our" -> "I simply want to get out"
https://t.co/dH8ArTtYMs
Let's begin the decode.
I simply want to get our great people $2000, rather than the measly $600 that is now in the bill. Also, stop the billions of dollars in \u201cpork\u201d.
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 26, 2020
More from Government
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?