My friend @RiirReeRii comes out with another argument against The Trinity

P1) God exists a se (From the definition of "God)
P2) The Father begetting the Son/Generation is a causal relation.
C1) Therefore, the Son exists ab alio.
P4) The Son is God (From, "Trinity")

C2) Therefore, the Son exists a se (From 1, 4)
C3) Therefore, the Son is exists both a se and ab alio (From C1 and C3)
C4) Therefore, "The Son" Is self-contradictory
C5) Therefore, The Trinity is self-contradictory
By a se we are just referring to God's aseity (i.e, the term a se means "through itself"). Aseity refers to God's uncaused, independant, unconditioned, necessary, etc. Existence.
We are simply exemplifying how God's existence is independant from and unaffected by anything outside of him. It's important to note that "Aseity" doesn't just mean "metaphysical necessity" / "existence in every possible world", since we could have Ab Alio necessities as well.
Ab Alio simply meaning, "Through another." In contrast with A se.

The second Premise might seem a bit weird. Someone might argue that the relation between the Father and the Son isn't "causal" in any sense. But this is just heretical.
This is recognized by several Church Historians such as (Kevin Giles, Michel Barnes, Steven Holmes, Christopher Beeley).
It's even acknowledged by several Christian Theologians such as (Richard Cross, Paul Helm, William Hasker, Ryan Mullins, William Lane Craig, J.T Pash, Chad McIntosh.) We can even look at the Nicene Creed, and see the usage of the word "Begotten" be defined as "That which has a…
…cause or source outside itself" (From Alastair Heron, a early church historian).

So now that 2 has been established, we can easily get 3. The Son doesn't exist through himself, but rather by being Begotten.
It's important to note that this causal relation doesn't have to be Asymmetrical. We can agree with St. Gregory of Nyssea and claim that this relation is purely symmetrical, but again, we still have causal dependance.
So the Son cannot exist "A se" (through himself), but rather, "Ab Alio" (through another.)

But, clearly, Christians believe the Son is God. and if God necessarily exists A se (which not a single Christian would even think of denying), then the Son can't be God.
As, nothing can exist both Ab Alio and A se. Therefore, The Trinity is self-contradictory.
All of these doctrines are affirmed by every single major Church Historian, Church Figure and Theologian (I don't think this is literally the case but I haven't been finding a single church figure disagreeing with this.)
The strength of this specific argument is that we no longer have to deal with poor defenses such as "Relative Identity" or anything of that sort. We aren't arguing for Polytheism, but rather a flat-out Contradiction inherent within the Trinity.

End/

More from For later read

Every single public defender. Every single day.


Bail arguments, motions, oral arguments, hearings. Judges don’t know, follow, or care about the law. Prosecutors are willing to take advantage of it. And mandatory minimums, withheld evidence, & pretrial detention coerces people to plead before trial. When theres a jury. A shot.

But defenders still fight. And still win. Most times wins aren’t “Justice.” It’s power of repetition of argument in front of same judges. Introducing those in power to the people they oppress. Not just a RAP sheet or words on a page. Defenders make it harder to be brutal & cruel.

I worked as a public defender at an office as well resourced as any in the country. Social workers, team of investigators, a reentry team, support staff, specialist attorneys in immigration, housing, education, family. Relatively low caseloads (80-100). And yet still injustice.

Most think that balancing the scales of justice means more funding for defenders. Thats part of it. Enough a attorneys to actually be at bail hearings. Wrap around services to be able to help people trapped in the system end up better off in their communities. Lower caseloads.

You May Also Like