BREAKING NEWS / DEVELOPING
Significant 3-Year Delta, Tomorrow!
18 posts to consider.
CHECKMATE inbound.
THREAD.
BIG news week?
Future proves past
..
NOTHING is a coincidence.
..
PATIENCE
THERE IS NO ESCAPE.
THERE ARE NO DEALS.
TREASON AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS
FOREIGN AGENTS WI|THIN OUR GOVERNMENT.
THE PUPPET MASTERS HAVE BEEN REMOVED.
...
Do you TRUST the US Military?
Do you TRUST the Chain of Command?
Have FAITH - WE ARE IN CONTROL.
..
YOU WERE CHOSEN FOR A REASON.
Jeremiah 29:11 [ESV]
11) For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare[a] and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope.
https://t.co/tYDodo846P
[Moar FUTURE PROVES PAST]
Have you not discovered the CONFIRMED correlation between posts here and Tweets yet?
https://t.co/MT7mC2JjZR
Who benefits from silencing the voice or Julian Assange?
— :111% :I-AM:SOVEREIGN-INNATE :BENJA{R}M1N-A:BOCK-~ (@BenjaminABock) January 10, 2021
Jan 12: @JulianAssange
Jan 13: "Checkmate" 3 year Delta
Jan 14: ?https://t.co/VkvetT3hTA pic.twitter.com/42u4XSMBvQ
Upcoming three year delta for Wednesday, Jan. 13th, 2021.
— :111% :I-AM:SOVEREIGN-INNATE :BENJA{R}M1N-A:BOCK-~ (@BenjaminABock) January 12, 2021
Checkmate used two other times.
Suggested: read all three year deltas from Jan. 2018 pic.twitter.com/yobyU2De4y
"countermoves" … Q proof confirmed. Will "death blossom" be employed? DECLAS!
https://t.co/YDaa2NujzQ
More from For later read
I’ve asked Byers to clarify, but as I read this tweet, it seems that Bret Stephens included an unredacted use of the n-word in his column this week to make a point, and the column got spiked—maybe as a result?
Four times. The column used the n-word (in the context of a quote) four times. https://t.co/14vPhQZktB
For context: In 2019, a Times reporter was reprimanded for several incidents of racial insensitivity on a trip with high school students, including one in which he used the n-word in a discussion of racial slurs.
That incident became public late last month, and late last week, after 150 Times employees complained about how it had been handled, the reporter in question resigned.
In the course of all that, the Times' executive editor said that the paper does not "tolerate racist language regardless of intent.” This was the quote that Bret Stephens was pushing back against in his column. (Which, again, was deep-sixed by the paper.)
Stephens goes on in his column (which never saw light of day) to cite famous Lee Atwater quote that uses racial slur, and which NYT has cited \u201cat least seven times.\u201d
— Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) February 11, 2021
"Is this now supposed to be a scandal?\u201d he asks.
...
Four times. The column used the n-word (in the context of a quote) four times. https://t.co/14vPhQZktB
That is correct. In his draft he quotes Atwater using the word (4 times) and he does not redact it.
— Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) February 11, 2021
For context: In 2019, a Times reporter was reprimanded for several incidents of racial insensitivity on a trip with high school students, including one in which he used the n-word in a discussion of racial slurs.
That incident became public late last month, and late last week, after 150 Times employees complained about how it had been handled, the reporter in question resigned.
In the course of all that, the Times' executive editor said that the paper does not "tolerate racist language regardless of intent.” This was the quote that Bret Stephens was pushing back against in his column. (Which, again, was deep-sixed by the paper.)
