.@claudiahammond introduces the panel discussion on elitism in occupational psychology with @NancyDoylePsych @TomCalvard @PavtweetKhurana and Ben Williams, former Chair of @ABPsychologists

Ben starts by taking a poll on the topic, do we feel the profession is elitist? 22% say yes, 13% say not at all. #DOPconf
Ben says if success comes to the "best" in a profession, how accessible is it? Or do factors such as network bring you to the elite? Challenging to level the playing field. #DOPconf
Turning to @PavtweetKhurana, who takes issue with "best". Who defines it, standards mapped against what? Does school define access? We can have an elite without elitism, it is exclusion that is problematic. #DOPconf
And now @NancyDoylePsych who talks about lack of disability, racial and other areas of representation in Occupational Psychology. #DOPconf
Big picture is that voting does not work (citing Hitler's rise), need experts to make decisions. Power, leadership and obligation in the workplace requires depth of experience. Without representation, we do not honourably hold those responsibilities. #DOPconf
Havoc wreaked when intense qualifications requiring finance are available compared to lack of "editorial control" (citing YouTube influencers). What does it mean to have standards and governance? Social injustice does not have to equal elitism, need to return to balance. #DOPconf
Over to @TomCalvard, who points out you can be elite without having elitist attitude. Need representation in democracy, but people may not feel elites reflect them. What kind of elite do we want to be? #DOPconf
Is there a conflation between elitism and expertise? asks @PavtweetKhurana Access unattainable for many due to cost of qualifications, memberships, supervision, loss of earnings etc. #DOPconf
Through this, people may not identify with #weareoccpsychs community. Access and opportunity require value - expertise and earnings. Is it worth it for those who want to but can't? #DOPconf
Ben Williams cites "pay-what-you-can" approach to conferences as one way to address access issues. Still takes money and time however. #DOPconf
Over to @TomCalvard who mentions how people approach a pathway/identity weighing up the possibilities, such as some non-negotiables such as university degrees. May be competing territories/organisations people turn to for placing their trust. #DOPconf
Thus impact of elitism impacts how people way up these factors and whether they identify with the community. #DOPconf
Onto @NancyDoylePsych who works with diverse range of people. She looks at pay rates in OP compared to medicine, where high pay comes with consultancy, and sees similarities. Difference is lack of funds and paid training. #DOPconf
She says #weareoccpsychs are homeless, with no consultancies or other companies funding training for diverse graduates. #DOPconf
Ben Williams agrees, saying employers have a lot to choose from but will choose unpaid internships over paid. Companies need to examine their ethical codes. #DOPconf
These issues lead to a "brand management problem" according to @NancyDoylePsych #DOPconf
Can we compare ourselves to medics/management consultancy? asks @PavtweetKhurana Lack of knowledge of our impact an issue, we should encourage each other and disseminate knowledge and expertise. #DOPconf
We fall somewhere in between medics and management consultants, says @NancyDoylePsych Earning potential depends on where we align ourselves, with leaders/business or with eg the unemployed. #DOPconf
Immense damage being done by unqualified psychometrics. We need legitimacy and moral code and cooperation. #DOPconf
Ben Williams agrees, saying we need to bring people into our umbrella and work together with a PR/Marketing approach. #DOPconf
Difficult to reform a profession, especially when relying on volunteers, says @TomCalvard when people are trying to earn a living. How to draw boundaries around community while bringing people in? #DOPconf
Potential for partnership with other professional communities is there, to pool resources and find commonality. #DOPconf
Also must ask why people leave the profession? says @TomCalvard Talking to people outside the community may help clarify this. How to convert people, can we give a clear path if they want to join? #DOPconf
Ben talks about level of engagement with profession rather than academic qualifications as worth looking at. @NancyDoylePsych adds that due diligence crucial, and who is paying for that at a social level. #DOPconf
Interesting questions coming in from #DOPconf attendees now. Ben very kindly offers informal chats to those who want to talk about getting into the profession.

More from For later read

Daily Bookmarks to GAVNet 02/12/2021

Quantum causal loops

https://t.co/emX8OxKPl0

#loops #quantum

Large-scale commodity farming accelerating climate change in the Amazon

https://t.co/v3gA7OTP9E

#ClimateChange #forest #farm

Collapsed glaciers increase Third Pole uncertainties: Downstream lakes may merge within a decade

https://t.co/huAma56KeB

#glacier #lakes #ClimateChange

From trash to treasure: Silicon waste finds new use in Li-ion batteries

https://t.co/TkxKFDQMC6

#batteries #treasure #silicon #trash
I’ve asked Byers to clarify, but as I read this tweet, it seems that Bret Stephens included an unredacted use of the n-word in his column this week to make a point, and the column got spiked—maybe as a result?


Four times. The column used the n-word (in the context of a quote) four times. https://t.co/14vPhQZktB


For context: In 2019, a Times reporter was reprimanded for several incidents of racial insensitivity on a trip with high school students, including one in which he used the n-word in a discussion of racial slurs.

That incident became public late last month, and late last week, after 150 Times employees complained about how it had been handled, the reporter in question resigned.

In the course of all that, the Times' executive editor said that the paper does not "tolerate racist language regardless of intent.” This was the quote that Bret Stephens was pushing back against in his column. (Which, again, was deep-sixed by the paper.)

You May Also Like

Following @BAUDEGS I have experienced hateful and propagandist tweets time after time. I have been shocked that an academic community would be so reckless with their publications. So I did some research.
The question is:
Is this an official account for Bahcesehir Uni (Bau)?


Bahcesehir Uni, BAU has an official website
https://t.co/ztzX6uj34V which links to their social media, leading to their Twitter account @Bahcesehir

BAU’s official Twitter account


BAU has many departments, which all have separate accounts. Nowhere among them did I find @BAUDEGS
@BAUOrganization @ApplyBAU @adayBAU @BAUAlumniCenter @bahcesehirfbe @baufens @CyprusBau @bauiisbf @bauglobal @bahcesehirebe @BAUintBatumi @BAUiletisim @BAUSaglik @bauebf @TIPBAU

Nowhere among them was @BAUDEGS to find