(first that came to mind)
This is a common human system metaphor, people talking about bridging between cultures or perspectives, or communities/individuals.
Spatial metaphors for human systems.
— Conor White-Sullivan \U000100cf\U0001f1fa\U0001f1f8 (@Conaw) December 18, 2020
1 like = 1 opinion on "Bridging subcultures that don\u2019t quite harmonize"
— Malcolm is back by the \U0001f30ecean! (@Malcolm_Ocean) December 16, 2019
(It's not quite a natural category for me but it's what vgr gave me and I like a challenge! good way to draw out some implicit opinions. comment if you have more specific Qs) https://t.co/eAn0MhwZfX
Your two eyes have different perspectives and thus contradict each other constantly about what's closer and what's on what side of what...
— Malcolm is back by the \U0001f30ecean! (@Malcolm_Ocean) May 11, 2020
...and\u2014usually\u2014rather than wasting energy on an argument over which 2D view is right, the brain integrates them into DEPTH PERCEPTION \U0001f92f pic.twitter.com/k9w9t8pqxE
"The opposite of war isn't peace\u2014it's creation!" pic.twitter.com/ayn9PIH6gx
— Malcolm is back by the \U0001f30ecean! (@Malcolm_Ocean) December 21, 2020
What's a survey question that would distinguish between...
— Eli Tyre (@EpistemicHope) December 20, 2020
"I am very into this woke stuff because I personally think it is correct"
vs.
"I will give woke-aligned answers to questions, because that stuff is labeled 'good' and I'm going with the social flow"?
Ahh fuckit part of my @threadapalooza thread had a clear subtopic and wanted to be its own thread.
— Malcolm is back by the \U0001f30ecean! (@Malcolm_Ocean) December 21, 2020
Here's the thread about "membranes" as a metaphor for groups of people. https://t.co/Ke0Dzv6L1q
Wanting to write a thread on the larger meta-vision I have that inspired me to make this move.
— Malcolm is back by the \U0001f30ecean! (@Malcolm_Ocean) October 19, 2020
Initially wrote this in response to @andy_matuschak's response "Y'all, this attitude is rad", but wanted it to be a top-level thread because it's important and stands on its own. https://t.co/kh6m8hFkql
New CEPR Discussion Paper - DP15802
— CEPR (@cepr_org) February 14, 2021
Culture, Institutions & the Long Divergence@albertobisin @nyuniversity, Jared Rubin @jaredcrubin @ChapmanU, Avner Seror @SerorAvner @amseaixmars @univamu, Thierry Verdier @PSEinfohttps://t.co/lhs6AJb7jE#CEPR_DE, #CEPR_EH, #CEPR_ITRE pic.twitter.com/FtMzAELljJ
I'm increasingly interested in the idea of "personal moats" in the context of careers.
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
Moats should be:
- Hard to learn and hard to do (but perhaps easier for you)
- Skills that are rare and valuable
- Legible
- Compounding over time
- Unique to your own talents & interests https://t.co/bB3k1YcH5b
People talk about \u201cpassive income\u201d a lot but not about \u201cpassive social capital\u201d or \u201cpassive networking\u201d or \u201cpassive knowledge gaining\u201d but that\u2019s what you can architect if you have a thing and it grows over time without intensive constant effort to sustain it
— Andrew Chen (@andrewchen) November 22, 2018
Things that look like moats but likely aren\u2019t or may fade:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) November 22, 2018
- Proprietary networks
- Being something other than one of the best at any tournament style-game
- Many "awards"
- Twitter followers or general reach without "respect"
- Anything that depends on information asymmetry https://t.co/abjxesVIh9