https://t.co/KKZXCLM6eI
https://t.co/226V6fr2kp
https://t.co/ECbrz0WTCJ
https://t.co/J3kqbczt4N
https://t.co/RrOiIxQK1t
https://t.co/HGtaJ6I3oB
11:37 pm not safe yet - if real a grave concern
https://t.co/NQw4d5fWdZ
@W71013 @3days3nights @NSA_QIL2 @DJLOK @cjtruth @CodeMonkeyZ @Millie__Weaver @PFC40Book The “E” account on Parler is sending SOS signals. Please check out the screenshots here. Many say it’s fake but I think it’s real. If real, not yet safe. Chester WV.
@EzraACohen
@GenFlynn @JosephJFlynn1 @LLinWood @PatrickByrne @SidneyPowell1 @DanScavino @dbongino
I am monitoring this.
“E is now safe” as of 11:45 pm Eastern - not E saying it.
https://t.co/mnGXS7i2ji
https://t.co/2EBIY6jOEn
https://t.co/5l8MNaWSeQ
https://t.co/bes8aiSoCo
https://t.co/MRQo5DGE5L
https://t.co/waT0NpqKYd
12:49 AM “Safe for now”

https://t.co/AjcsfNpv7N
So many good people out there. God bless you
“Not on Parler”
@threadreaderapp unroll
@threader_app compile

More from Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal PhD

SolarWinds follow up. Very good tweet explaining what happened.


Basically what this means is that SolarWinds itself was exploited. Someone posted an infected update as legitimate (digitally signed), leading customers to download a bad update.

“Multiple trojanized updates were digitally signed from March - May 2020 and posted to the SolarWinds updates website” https://t.co/8e3bMFWXYu


FireEye then explains that infected organizations were approached and exploited. This is a separate Step 2.

At this point, information is already going to “malicious domains” without extra intervention, after the malware does nothing for “up to two weeks”

More from For later read

I’ve asked Byers to clarify, but as I read this tweet, it seems that Bret Stephens included an unredacted use of the n-word in his column this week to make a point, and the column got spiked—maybe as a result?


Four times. The column used the n-word (in the context of a quote) four times. https://t.co/14vPhQZktB


For context: In 2019, a Times reporter was reprimanded for several incidents of racial insensitivity on a trip with high school students, including one in which he used the n-word in a discussion of racial slurs.

That incident became public late last month, and late last week, after 150 Times employees complained about how it had been handled, the reporter in question resigned.

In the course of all that, the Times' executive editor said that the paper does not "tolerate racist language regardless of intent.” This was the quote that Bret Stephens was pushing back against in his column. (Which, again, was deep-sixed by the paper.)
Excited we finally have a draft of this paper, which attempts to provide a 'unifying theory' of the long economic divergence between the Middle East & Western Europe

As we see it, there are 3 recent theories that hit on important aspects of the divergence...

1/


One set of theories focus on the legitimating power of Islam (Rubin, @prof_ahmetkuru, Platteau). This gave religious clerics greater power, which pulled political resources away form those encouraging economic development

But these theories leave some questions unanswered...
2/

Religious legitimacy is only effective if people
care what religious authorities dictate. Given the economic consequences, why do people remain religious, and thereby render religious legitimacy effective? Is religiosity a cause or a consequence of institutional arrangements?

3/

Another set of theories focus on the religious proscriptions of Islam, particular those associated with Islamic law (@timurkuran). These laws were appropriate for the setting they formed but had unforeseeable consequences and failed to change as economic circumstances changed

4/

There are unaddressed questions here, too

Muslim rulers must have understood that Islamic law carried proscriptions that hampered economic development. Why, then, did they continue to use Islamic institutions (like courts) that promoted inefficiencies?

5/

You May Also Like