Not easy for OEMs to import non-refrigerant fill ACs,unpack,gas fill test,negates cost advantage
#amberenterprises Q2fy21 concall transcript
Q2 went well for Room AC industry,uptick retail demand, pent up demand
Overall electronic & consumer durables witnessed a good quarter
Inventory levels back to normal
Anticipate better H2fy21
#stock #StocksToWatch #Nifty #sensex
Not easy for OEMs to import non-refrigerant fill ACs,unpack,gas fill test,negates cost advantage
China plus 1 unfolding,global MNC enquiring about RAC & components
Amber started export of components to US
Strengthened portfolio in Sidwal for railway,metros,bus ACs
Revenue 408 cr in Q2fy21 vs 623 yoy
RAC 36% ,components & mobile apps 64% contribution to revenue
Ebidta Q2fy21 22 vs 39 cr yoy
Sidwal business to focus on metros & AC coaches
IN JIN & EVER to focus on inverter ACs,post development of own inverter PCB board,expect to add more business in IN JIN & EVER
#amberenterprises
Ban on refrigerant AC import to lead to volume expansion from Feb 21
ACs to US mkt ,1st sample to be ready by Jan,next yr for reliability testing & approval cycles,fy22 room AC exports may start
Entered commercial AC mkt,approvals came Q2,started exports though low volumes,to expand portfolio to 18-20 products,mkt size ductable 4000cr & VRV 2500 crs
2 large tenders from Delhi metro for Sidwal worth 98 crs
Export of RACs,65 million ACs, 80% from China & 20% from Thailand,2 biggest exporters of RACs
Amber on par for cost of 1.5,2 tonne ACs,countries with no FTA in place expect apple to apple cost
AC industry mainly outsourced, from 34% in Jan 2018 to 48% now,Amber share up from 55 to 70% post ipo
Expect reliability cycle for RAC to complete in 2021,export 2022
Shift of business in Q2, 64% business from components out of which 60% from non AC components
US large mkt for RAC,20 out of 65 mn exports are to US,opened sales office
Channel inventory for RAC down from 2.2-2.4 mn to 6-7lakhs
#amberenterprises provides comprehensive & integrated solutions, strong R&D,15 plants across India,wide range 0.75-2 tonn,all star category,1stop for components
@threadreaderapp
Compile
@threader_app
@nid_rockz
@tycoonmindset05
@SForStiletto @thescorpionphil @Coolfundoo @havellsindia @myvoltas
#amberenterprises #atmanirbhar #plischeme #chinaplus1
More from For later read
You May Also Like
1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.
Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?
A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:
Next level tactic when closing a sale, candidate, or investment:
— Erik Torenberg (@eriktorenberg) February 27, 2018
Ask: \u201cWhat needs to be true for you to be all in?\u201d
You'll usually get an explicit answer that you might not get otherwise. It also holds them accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to
- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal
3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:
Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.
Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.
4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?
To get clarity.
You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.
It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.
5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”
Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.