One of my fav docs to come back to during all market cycles. Covering Investment principles, checklists, economic cycles/bubbles, value traps & more. Phenomenal compilation by @pcordway👏

cc:
@dmuthuk @Gautam__Baid @saxena_puru

Some
of my fav content.⬇️

https://t.co/TIkvktVoJC

Pretty good process and checklist.
Tenets from "The Warren Buffett Way"
Some lessons from Ben Graham
Phil Fisher's 15 Questions and 10 Don'ts.
Mistakes and biases from the book "Why Smart People Make Big Money Mistakes".
Howard Marks' wisdom.

The 2nd pic with "Investment and Credit Cycles" is an essential understanding.
✔️Principles of Good Corporate Governance
✔️Principles of Focused Investing
✔️Bill Ruane's Four Rules of Smart Investing
Some Financial shenanigans
Lessons from Jim Chanos on shorting (and stuff to avoid on the long side)
Seven traits shared by great investors
Common mental mistakes and behavioral biases (from Whitney Tilson)
Business checklist from Tom Gardner
Lessons from Akre Capital
Good explanation of bubbles
Guy Spier's "25 Common Mental Mistakes"
Ending with some Life lessons from Buffett & Munger
Of course, for someone investing in individual stocks, the LT results primarily depend on the economics of the business (including quality, durability, financials), Valuation, holding period and reactions to (non business) volatility...
..but this document gives a pretty good overview of many good investing principles that could be incorporated as they fit into your process and being aware of all the detractions in the markets (poor quality Cos, bubbles, cycles, behavioral biases...)

/END

More from Ram Bhupatiraju

More from Finance

You May Also Like

"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."


We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.

Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)

It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.

Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".