We all know no-one should profit from antisemitic hate speech right? Well, tell that to the @JewishChron.
In their media pack they advertise that they've run (at least) one event with Nigel Farage as a speaker. The JC is using their connection with an antisemite to make money.
What kind of advertisers do they want??
Is Nigel actually an antisemite, Geoffrey hears someone ask in terribly bad faith. Well, lets explore his history of antisemitism through the JC’s own articles!
Now lets work backwards, shall we?
Now, Farage dismisses all the criticism. The one time he has responded to coverage of it, he called the condemnation a "manufactured story" and "pathetic". He has no apparent intention of stopping the use of such themes.
— Peter Walker (@peterwalker99) June 29, 2020
6/
More from Finance
Thread Best books recommendation by one of best investor I knew @insharebazaar (Virtually)
He grab many multibagger stocks and His style also unique(1st Seen interview in @TraderHarneet's YT Channel)
He follow Simple process
Young Intelligent Investor who also appeared in ET
1. One Up On Wall Street
2. Rich Dad Poor Dad
Access here : https://t.co/UWOCF732z6
3. The Unusual Billionaires
4. Trading in the Zone
https://t.co/G7mqVPtEM0
5. Market Wizards
6. The Intelligent Investor
https://t.co/yPKBzYyPAl
7. The Five Rules for Successful Stock Investing
8. Reminiscences of a Stock Operator
https://t.co/PiioB3hdHP
He grab many multibagger stocks and His style also unique(1st Seen interview in @TraderHarneet's YT Channel)
He follow Simple process
Young Intelligent Investor who also appeared in ET
1. One Up On Wall Street
2. Rich Dad Poor Dad
Access here : https://t.co/UWOCF732z6
3. The Unusual Billionaires
4. Trading in the Zone
https://t.co/G7mqVPtEM0
5. Market Wizards
6. The Intelligent Investor
https://t.co/yPKBzYyPAl
7. The Five Rules for Successful Stock Investing
8. Reminiscences of a Stock Operator
https://t.co/PiioB3hdHP
You May Also Like
A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.
Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.
6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices
https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x
PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.
735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices
https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ
The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.
The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.