Nifty 50 market-cap weight index - the market decides how much you are #investing in each stock - like HDFC bank -10%, RIL 10%, Adani 0.7%
N50 Equal wt - 2% invested equally in all stocks.
Eq wt gives more weightgae to bottom stocks too.
Better returns due to higher risk.
More from India ETFs & Index Funds
Important.
Whenever you invest in Fund of funds, check the expense ratios of both the local fund & the global fund which is investing into.
e.g., Nasdaq FOF ER is 0.1%, but you have to add the ER of ETF which 0.54%, total 0.64%
Good to see AMCs like @EdelweissMF mentioning it.
Whenever you invest in Fund of funds, check the expense ratios of both the local fund & the global fund which is investing into.
e.g., Nasdaq FOF ER is 0.1%, but you have to add the ER of ETF which 0.54%, total 0.64%
Good to see AMCs like @EdelweissMF mentioning it.
When you invest in a global fund, and compare expenses across funds:
— Radhika Gupta (@iRadhikaGupta) June 22, 2021
1. Compare \U0001f34e to \U0001f34e: Total cost includes offshore fund cost plus what local AMC charges.
2. Get this data from the AMC website. Many 3rd party websites don\u2019t include underlying fund costs.
1/3
More from Etf
Important.
Whenever you invest in Fund of funds, check the expense ratios of both the local fund & the global fund which is investing into.
e.g., Nasdaq FOF ER is 0.1%, but you have to add the ER of ETF which 0.54%, total 0.64%
Good to see AMCs like @EdelweissMF mentioning it.
Whenever you invest in Fund of funds, check the expense ratios of both the local fund & the global fund which is investing into.
e.g., Nasdaq FOF ER is 0.1%, but you have to add the ER of ETF which 0.54%, total 0.64%
Good to see AMCs like @EdelweissMF mentioning it.
When you invest in a global fund, and compare expenses across funds:
— Radhika Gupta (@iRadhikaGupta) June 22, 2021
1. Compare \U0001f34e to \U0001f34e: Total cost includes offshore fund cost plus what local AMC charges.
2. Get this data from the AMC website. Many 3rd party websites don\u2019t include underlying fund costs.
1/3
You May Also Like
Recently, the @CNIL issued a decision regarding the GDPR compliance of an unknown French adtech company named "Vectaury". It may seem like small fry, but the decision has potential wide-ranging impacts for Google, the IAB framework, and today's adtech. It's thread time! 👇
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
It's all in French, but if you're up for it you can read:
• Their blog post (lacks the most interesting details): https://t.co/PHkDcOT1hy
• Their high-level legal decision: https://t.co/hwpiEvjodt
• The full notification: https://t.co/QQB7rfynha
I've read it so you needn't!
Vectaury was collecting geolocation data in order to create profiles (eg. people who often go to this or that type of shop) so as to power ad targeting. They operate through embedded SDKs and ad bidding, making them invisible to users.
The @CNIL notes that profiling based off of geolocation presents particular risks since it reveals people's movements and habits. As risky, the processing requires consent — this will be the heart of their assessment.
Interesting point: they justify the decision in part because of how many people COULD be targeted in this way (rather than how many have — though they note that too). Because it's on a phone, and many have phones, it is considered large-scale processing no matter what.
THREAD: 12 Things Everyone Should Know About IQ
1. IQ is one of the most heritable psychological traits – that is, individual differences in IQ are strongly associated with individual differences in genes (at least in fairly typical modern environments). https://t.co/3XxzW9bxLE
2. The heritability of IQ *increases* from childhood to adulthood. Meanwhile, the effect of the shared environment largely fades away. In other words, when it comes to IQ, nature becomes more important as we get older, nurture less. https://t.co/UqtS1lpw3n
3. IQ scores have been increasing for the last century or so, a phenomenon known as the Flynn effect. https://t.co/sCZvCst3hw (N ≈ 4 million)
(Note that the Flynn effect shows that IQ isn't 100% genetic; it doesn't show that it's 100% environmental.)
4. IQ predicts many important real world outcomes.
For example, though far from perfect, IQ is the single-best predictor of job performance we have – much better than Emotional Intelligence, the Big Five, Grit, etc. https://t.co/rKUgKDAAVx https://t.co/DWbVI8QSU3
5. Higher IQ is associated with a lower risk of death from most causes, including cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, most forms of cancer, homicide, suicide, and accident. https://t.co/PJjGNyeQRA (N = 728,160)
1. IQ is one of the most heritable psychological traits – that is, individual differences in IQ are strongly associated with individual differences in genes (at least in fairly typical modern environments). https://t.co/3XxzW9bxLE
2. The heritability of IQ *increases* from childhood to adulthood. Meanwhile, the effect of the shared environment largely fades away. In other words, when it comes to IQ, nature becomes more important as we get older, nurture less. https://t.co/UqtS1lpw3n
3. IQ scores have been increasing for the last century or so, a phenomenon known as the Flynn effect. https://t.co/sCZvCst3hw (N ≈ 4 million)
(Note that the Flynn effect shows that IQ isn't 100% genetic; it doesn't show that it's 100% environmental.)
4. IQ predicts many important real world outcomes.
For example, though far from perfect, IQ is the single-best predictor of job performance we have – much better than Emotional Intelligence, the Big Five, Grit, etc. https://t.co/rKUgKDAAVx https://t.co/DWbVI8QSU3
5. Higher IQ is associated with a lower risk of death from most causes, including cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, most forms of cancer, homicide, suicide, and accident. https://t.co/PJjGNyeQRA (N = 728,160)