Here is a university road map on how the strengths of conventional, face-to-face teaching and online T&L can be optimally used to address today’s lecture room challenges.

I am not an instructional designer, but I have been teaching online internationally for over 10 years (2)
In the last 2+ years, I taught hybrid & online undergraduate courses at the University of Maryland Global Campus, among the largest top-20 online colleges in the USA.

UMGC has received numerous awards for its innovations: https://t.co/jd7JkHIK8Q and https://t.co/IPKizZwclA (3)
15+ years ago UMGC was one of the founding members of QM “Quality Matters” a non-profit with 1,500+ members in 26 countries.

QM offers membership of a community of practice, numerous free resources, online training, and review/accreditation services https://t.co/ZoFVsgcBC7 (4)
It is obvious that universities will also be affected by the 4th industrial revolution, and things can not stay the same as they were after the invention of the printing press.

Until recently, a lecture room looked the same as 900 years ago incl. flirting and sleeping (5)
We can distinguish Luddite resistance to technology and stubborn clinging to “chalk and talk”, from reasonable questions on how to using online learning in 30-60% of all university courses, which is the likely post-COVID19 scenario. (6)
If active learning is already practiced, and reliance on lecturing is no longer 100%, it is easier to introduce effective, high-quality online teaching.

Lecturers who already use problem- or project-based teaching are at an advantage (7)
Dr. Carl Wieman, Nobel prize winner Physics, did systematic research on what works and what doesn’t in science teaching because he saw that PhD students after 4 years were still unable to do physics (at Stanford!!).

In his own words: https://t.co/7EjYs9qZ2y (8)
General pedagogy must be improved: concepts of active learning, student-centred teaching & intentional course design must be practiced first.

Lecturers can revise their conventional courses in workshops led by your friendly instructional designers. https://t.co/JkZfNW2nsV (9)
Secondly, specific online pedagogy must be introduced or strengthened. The 6 success factors for the successful delivery of online teaching must be taken into account, and challenges addressed (10)
Good instructional design is a first and fundamental step: implementing a few robust principles go a long way to make all online courses effective & accessible and engaging for all students.

Adding classroom-replicating technology usually makes matters worse (11)
In practice, the main challenge is to train ALL lecturers.

Your handful of friendly & helpful instructional designers at our universities, who were sufficient in the past, now can not possibly train faculty at scale within a short period of time (12)
We suggest you check out membership of QM “Quality Matters” in order to use all low-cost, online training and professional development activities.

Here is a video overview of the QM standard. https://t.co/1i2s0loEuC, and here a detailed guide https://t.co/SQkVHwjBgp (13)
The debate should now be redirected from dealing exclusively with WHAT to teach, toward HOW to teach effectively, realizing online teaching is now the main course, and will remain on the menu (14)
Are you interested in learning more about how QM can train your university’s lecturers? DM me so I can help you further 🙂

More from Education

Chicago Public Schools are supposed to open for some special needs and pre-K students Monday

The Chicago Teachers Union is now threatening to refuse to return to work in person.

https://t.co/MgDgNe6REj


Meanwhile
https://t.co/FIij8J3r7z

Dr. Fauci: "The default position should be to try as best as possible within reason to keep the children in school or to get them back to school [...] if you look at the data the spread among children and from children is not really big at


UNICEF: "Data from 191 countries shows no consistent link between reopening schools and increased rates of coronavirus
This seems like a positive base from which to #BuildBackBetter


https://t.co/OwpgNh8mEu


https://t.co/7eOi1Bv3bM


https://t.co/GhxVgLuWJE


https://t.co/ymHp910wrC

You May Also Like

First thread of the year because I have time during MCO. As requested, a thread on the gods and spirits of Malay folk religion. Some are indigenous, some are of Indian origin, some have Islamic


Before I begin, it might be worth explaining the Malay conception of the spirit world. At its deepest level, Malay religious belief is animist. All living beings and even certain objects are said to have a soul. Natural phenomena are either controlled by or personified as spirits

Although these beings had to be respected, not all of them were powerful enough to be considered gods. Offerings would be made to the spirits that had greater influence on human life. Spells and incantations would invoke their


Two known examples of such elemental spirits that had god-like status are Raja Angin (king of the wind) and Mambang Tali Arus (spirit of river currents). There were undoubtedly many more which have been lost to time

Contact with ancient India brought the influence of Hinduism and Buddhism to SEA. What we now call Hinduism similarly developed in India out of native animism and the more formal Vedic tradition. This can be seen in the multitude of sacred animals and location-specific Hindu gods