50 Common Mistakes most developers make while starting out

A thread🧵👇

⚡️1. Focusing on completing courses instead of coding (or completing projects) .

⚡️2. Skipping the fundamentals.

⚡️3. Not joining a developer community.

⚡️4. Not creating projects from scratch.

⚡️5. Skipping Data Structures.
⚡️6. Not reading the documentation.

⚡️7. Trying to learn everything in one day.

⚡️8. Blindly following the tutorial and not extending the code or making their own version of code.

⚡️9. Not asking for help when needed.

⚡️10. Never commenting the code (In required places).
⚡️11. Endlessly Planning instead of Building.

⚡️12. Learning different technologies instead of mastering one.

⚡️13. Not reading stuff (books/articles/documentation).

⚡️14. Not maintaining a balance between programming and not programming.

⚡️15. Not finishing what they started
⚡️16. Not building stuff they care about.

⚡️17. Getting overwhelmed by others' progress/headstart

⚡️18. Not knowing when to quite and start over.

⚡️19. Not practising enough.

⚡️20. Endlessly buying Udemy courses.
⚡️21. Not trying new stuff (frameworks etc).

⚡️22. Not sleeping enough.

⚡️23. Getting addicted to caffeine.

⚡️24. Being afraid to experimentation.

⚡️25. Letting Impostor syndrome take over.
⚡️26. Overworking.

⚡️27. Sacrificing Social life.

⚡️28. Rushing through a problem/course/book/project

⚡️29. Not being curious.

⚡️30. Sacrificing Mental Health.
⚡️31. Not having fun.

⚡️32. Getting stuck on one technology because of stubbornness.

⚡️33. Lacking self motivation.

⚡️34. Not talking to other developers.

⚡️35. Quiting after failing.
⚡️36. Not building personal projects.

⚡️37. Not showing your projects to others.

⚡️38. Not asking others for feedback.

⚡️39. Trying to learn everything at once.

⚡️40. Blindly following others advise without researching on your own.
⚡️41. Not having a strategy.

⚡️42. Waiting until everything is perfect.

⚡️43. Not learning from one's mistakes.

⚡️44. Feeling dumb.

⚡️45. Comparing yourself to others.
⚡️46. Not reading theory.

⚡️47. Not maintaining a balance in life.

⚡️48. Being a perfectionist.(Conditions apply)

⚡️49. Not accepting uncertainty.

⚡️50. Not finding mentors/dev friends

Don't make these mistakes.
Happy Coding ♥️🧑‍💻👨‍💻👩‍💻
I am soo sorry everyone😆

Btw follow me for more programming experience/content⚡️
https://t.co/jYdLWemPhu

More from Nirbhay Vashisht

More from Education

The outrage is not that she fit better. The outrage is that she stated very firmly on national television with no caveat, that there are no conditions not improved by exercise. Many people with viral sequelae have been saying for years that exercise has made them more disabled 1/


And the new draft NICE guidelines for ME/CFS which often has a viral onset specifically say that ME/CFS patients shouldn't do graded exercise. Clare is fully aware of this but still made a sweeping and very firm statement that all conditions are improved by exercise. This 2/

was an active dismissal of the lived experience of hundreds of thousands of patients with viral sequelae. Yes, exercise does help so many conditions. Yes, a very small number of people with an ME/CFS diagnosis are helped by exercise. But the vast majority of people with ME, a 3/

a quintessential post-viral condition, are made worse by exercise. Many have been left wheelchair dependent of bedbound by graded exercise therapy when they could walk before. To dismiss the lived experience of these patients with such a sweeping statement is unethical and 4/

unsafe. Clare has every right to her lived experience. But she can't, and you can't justifiably speak out on favour of listening to lived experience but cherry pick the lived experiences you are going to listen to. Why are the lived experiences of most people with ME dismissed?

You May Also Like

The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.