The Maoist struggle session is the only known end point for the traitors who will soon challenge us.

The time is coming when many of us will have to stand up to co-parents, school head teachers etc when they challenge us with what they know to be falsehoods.

The struggle👇

session is of course the same as the inquisition that was used in Europe in the Middle Ages. The technique was developed and used by the Jesuit Brotherhood, later in Mao’s China and now by the globalists. Nothing has changed.

The basics are that the enemy knows that he 👇
or she is telling lies. The object of the process is not truth but the victim’s throwing-away of the ability to decide. Domestic or workplace abusers of the more calculating kind use this method as a way of hobbling their victims, knowing that even if submission is not there, 👇
the fear of future assault will be.

The challenge that is coming, whether it is about vaccines being the only route to ‘herd immunity’ or how illness is spread by asymptomatic (healthy) people will one based on bogus scientific doctrine.

But do *not* focus on the untruths.👇
Their aim will not be to determine truth but to force us to submit to labels, whether ‘denier’, ‘anti-vaxxer’ or ‘conspiracy theorist’. This is the object of the struggle.

The traitors have also been trained to make you feel that you’re under observation. They will make 👇
a show of observing your body language and hand gestures. They want you to think that evidence is being gathered. Ignore this.

Remember throughout any such episodes that you are watching a rehearsed performance. This is not a person in front of you.

You know the truth. 👇
Stick to the truth and speak it calmly. If your inquisitor gets flustered, ask them if all’s well with them. You could even ask if there’s something you could help them with.

Make sure that this is the *only* transaction you ever offer.

If you stick to the truth and are not 👇
provoked, the inquisitor will give up.

Remember that the interaction is not with a person - it is with a programme. Once it runs through enough times without submission or provocation (engagement), it will stop.

Stand your ground calmly in self possession. 👇
Here’s a link to a description from Mao’s China: https://t.co/vAl2JEgGei
@threadreaderapp please unroll

More from Education

You May Also Like

1/“What would need to be true for you to….X”

Why is this the most powerful question you can ask when attempting to reach an agreement with another human being or organization?

A thread, co-written by @deanmbrody:


2/ First, “X” could be lots of things. Examples: What would need to be true for you to

- “Feel it's in our best interest for me to be CMO"
- “Feel that we’re in a good place as a company”
- “Feel that we’re on the same page”
- “Feel that we both got what we wanted from this deal

3/ Normally, we aren’t that direct. Example from startup/VC land:

Founders leave VC meetings thinking that every VC will invest, but they rarely do.

Worse over, the founders don’t know what they need to do in order to be fundable.

4/ So why should you ask the magic Q?

To get clarity.

You want to know where you stand, and what it takes to get what you want in a way that also gets them what they want.

It also holds them (mentally) accountable once the thing they need becomes true.

5/ Staying in the context of soliciting investors, the question is “what would need to be true for you to want to invest (or partner with us on this journey, etc)?”

Multiple responses to this question are likely to deliver a positive result.