Today’s GDP release, and in particular how the economy has adapted, a thread.👇

After 6 months of growth, the economy started shrinking again in November as tighter restrictions were in place. (Though there were variations across Wales, England, Scotland and Northern Ireland.) (1/n)
The economy shrank by 2.6% in November. In normal times this would be a significant downturn, but it is much smaller than the falls seen with the first restrictions in the spring: April GDP fell by around 20%. In that sense it is good news. But why the smaller fall? (2/n)
Firstly, some industries remain very depressed. Airlines (air transport in the chart) for example, were operating at very low levels in October so there wasn’t much further for their output to fall. This is different from the picture in Mar/Apr. (3/n)
The same is true, though perhaps less pronounced, for bars/restaurants and other parts of the service sector. (4/n)
Secondly, some sections of the economy have undergone a structural shift that has allowed them to continue to meet demand/produce output. Perhaps the best example is in retail. Overall sales in November were higher than pre-pandemic despite the restrictions. (5/n)
This is due, in part, to the shift online, which allowed sales to continue when shops were shut. These structural shifts create winners (on-line retailers) and losers (high-street), so a positive overall story can hide some significant distress for some businesses. (6/n)
There are also knock-on effects of this move on-line, with courier/postal services seeing growth through the pandemic. (7/n)
And there have been wider changes: food retailers have gained at the expenses of restaurants, and home improvement shops have benefited as consumers appeared to shift expenditure from other activities such as holidays and travel. (8/n)
Whether these changes are permanent or temporary, we will have to wait to see. (9/n)
Thirdly, individual industries (and businesses) have become more resilient to the restrictions. We saw big falls in construction during the first set of national restrictions, but continued growth during the November restrictions. (10/n)
This is likely due to social distancing in workplaces, etc. that have allowed operations to continue. (11/n)
Overall, the economic impacts are smaller this time. But we should not lose sight of the fact that the economy has still taken a large hit from the pandemic, and beneath the surface there are hugely different experiences for different sectors, businesses and people. (ENDS)

More from Economy

Long rant: This @WSJ article bemoaning the decline of price theory is really worth highlighting. The economic theories and so called "laws of economics" that the WSJ consistently and religiously defends, are the source of their authority, power and privilege.


So called economic "theories" like "you get paid exactly what you are worth" and "markets are perfectly efficient" and "when wages rise, jobs fall" and "raising taxes on the rich kills jobs and growth" and "increasing justice decreases economic efficiency" and...

"Government intervention in markets always creates more harm than good" and "any regulation that constrains corporations kills growth and productivity", etc etc are effectively a protection racket for the rich. It is a set of internally consistent and mathematized conjectures...

That are all demonstrably nonsense. But getting people to accept these "theories" as laws of nature and immutable, timeless truths is the most effective way our current economic elites have found to maintain and enhance the status of the powerful and persuade the weak and poor...

to shut the fuck up and accept their lot in life. Now, FINALLY, some economists- are actually beginning to look at the real world evidence to determine whether these propositions actually describe anything real here on planet earth. Let me save you some time. The answer is NO.

You May Also Like

I think a plausible explanation is that whatever Corbyn says or does, his critics will denounce - no matter how much hypocrisy it necessitates.


Corbyn opposes the exploitation of foreign sweatshop-workers - Labour MPs complain he's like Nigel

He speaks up in defence of migrants - Labour MPs whinge that he's not listening to the public's very real concerns about immigration:

He's wrong to prioritise Labour Party members over the public:

He's wrong to prioritise the public over Labour Party