A thread of business related TV series..... Which is your favorite?
1. Billions vs Suits
Sure 2odds
5 odds
10 odds
20 odds
Join his telegram channel through the link below to get your own. You have nothing to lose RN
https://t.co/bwDYhmOpyU
https://t.co/bwDYhmOpyU
Thank me later guys 🙏🏾
https://t.co/iyBBgzwNdj
A thread of business oriented movies.... Which is your favorite?
— Nielo\U0001f98d\U0001f985 (@only1nielo) December 31, 2020
1 The Banker vs Wolf of Wall street pic.twitter.com/05lKvzGmm0
A Thread of war action movies you'll definitely enjoy..... Which is your favorite from each?
— Nielo\U0001f98d\U0001f985 (@only1nielo) December 18, 2020
1. BEAST OF NO NATION VS 13 HOURS: SSOB pic.twitter.com/hD72Zy95Xa
Movies uploaded
Music
Pc games
Sex comics
Entertainment etc
Just join this channel to enjoy them all.
https://t.co/pCnfB5cPBC
I will show you how to get credit alerts steady
Join with link:
https://t.co/oLMwgVKIBG
More from Culture
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x