United fans are mad if they don’t want Sancho. Those calling for Grealish over him need to assess how they fit into this current United side.

Grealish works if he replaces Pogba in the formation against Villa the other night. Otherwise he doesn’t fit #MUFC

Sancho at RW is the bigger need. Yes we have Diallo & Pellistri but neither are ready to start week in week out.

I love Grealish, he’s class. But unless you’re willing to shift Rashford permanently to RW, it doesn’t work.

We’ve also got VDB who can’t get a game right now #MUFC
United are better off buying a top DM with the money it will cost to sign Grealish.

Say Pogba leaves, the need is to bring in someone who can play deeper and can control the tempo of a game.

Neves is the obvious choice #MUFC
It’s so important that our next 3 signings are signings which move the needle and move United to serious challengers on all fronts.

Buying players that we are unsure where they fit into the current system is negligent and is the reason we’ve recruited so poorly #MUFC
The past 2 seasons we’ve recruited well, and it’s important we continue to do that.

Sancho still moves the needle and gives us a genuine RW. We saw AWB profit from a player holding his width more.

It also provides more balance to the attack #MUFC
It’s quite clear Sancho’s head has been turned and he’s unhappy he didn’t get his move.

In reality United did the right thing walking away from that £120m price tag.

He’s still extremely talented. You don’t become poor overnight. Stop with the reactionary nonsense #MUFC
If United stick to the 4231 v Villa then I’d be saying go for Grealish. He’d play that Pogba role on the left very well.

But it’s unlikely that Rashford will be shifted out to RW permanently. Sancho is still the no 1 target and that’s how it should be #MUFC
Then look to invest in a deep lying midfielder than has both athleticism & ball playing ability to play in the single pivot.

That would allow us to go to 433 and we can play 2 8s. It also provides greater protection for the back 4.

You can then assess the CB position #MUFC

More from Culture

You May Also Like

https://t.co/6cRR2B3jBE
Viruses and other pathogens are often studied as stand-alone entities, despite that, in nature, they mostly live in multispecies associations called biofilms—both externally and within the host.

https://t.co/FBfXhUrH5d


Microorganisms in biofilms are enclosed by an extracellular matrix that confers protection and improves survival. Previous studies have shown that viruses can secondarily colonize preexisting biofilms, and viral biofilms have also been described.


...we raise the perspective that CoVs can persistently infect bats due to their association with biofilm structures. This phenomenon potentially provides an optimal environment for nonpathogenic & well-adapted viruses to interact with the host, as well as for viral recombination.


Biofilms can also enhance virion viability in extracellular environments, such as on fomites and in aquatic sediments, allowing viral persistence and dissemination.
These 10 threads will teach you more than reading 100 books

Five billionaires share their top lessons on startups, life and entrepreneurship (1/10)


10 competitive advantages that will trump talent (2/10)


Some harsh truths you probably don’t want to hear (3/10)


10 significant lies you’re told about the world (4/10)