There are those who claim that rock music is blessed and dedicated to the devil, so we should not listen to it. The reality is that even a lot of Christian music and all other types are as well. The recording industry has leaders in it that are bad.

So what to do with it?

The movie and television industry is plagued as well with such problems.

So what can we do about that?

The reality is that not all music or media need be avoided. Honestly someone may dedicate a Mozart recording to the devil, but this does not mean we then are tricked into
inviting in bad spirits because we listen to Mozart. We cannot control or know for sure what music is or is not blessed with dark rituals with certainty. We can know the content of the music or movies though.

What emotions do they convey? What type of spirit do we feel?
Take rap music for the most part. Do you feel that the Eternal society is pleased with is as a genre, not talking about any one song?

Not in the least. The genre as a whole has been used to intentionally divide and conquer. It is meant for bad purposes.
So what will happen is those in the industry who are the problems will go. The industry will have a lot of people cleared out. There will be big changes to it.

There is no way you can avoind everything that has had rites, rituals and dark blessings put on it
It is not just music and movies either. Essentially almost all things in life are meant to harm us in one way or another. There is no avoiding all of that. All we can do is the best we can and be guided by the spirit. If the spirit is good, that is what we need.
There is an occult belief that they can trick us into performing rites for the devil. They wove hidden rites even into sacred holidays to trick us into performing their rituals unknowingly to give them power.

So knowing what you do, why do you think that was allowed?
Quite honestly, the ancient families wanted to treat humanity like slaves. They really did not want to give us our bread and circus. So how do you get a horrible group to make sure we have some entertainment? Well trick them into thinking it is bad for us.
Yes that is not ideal, but at the time it was the best that could be done. So there was a belief that the power of a crowd would be harnessed for real power for the elite. So sports was harnessed to give them that power. It provided an outlet that was better than fighting.
You should be able to see the pattern. People needed holidays. So, trick the elite into thinking they are having the whole population willingly perform their rites. When you get the elite laughing gleefully at how clever they are to fool people, a lot can be done.
The elite think one thing, the rest have something that can actually mean a lot to us, and of course much money can be made on the holidays, sports, music, and movies.

The elite are evil and do not do good. They had to be fooled into helping provide us with a decent life.
This is why it really does not matter as much that someone blessed something for the devil. Everything the elite does is meant to hurt us or give them power of some sort. As there was no better solution that worked, here we are.

This will change though.
The elite will forever be removed from power. This is a process that may take a bit to complete, but they are being removed. We will have music, movies, and all manner of nice things that are not corrupted. Until then we do the best we can and stay away from the worst of it.

More from Culture

One of the authors of the Policy Exchange report on academic free speech thinks it is "ridiculous" to expect him to accurately portray an incident at Cardiff University in his study, both in the reporting and in a question put to a student sample.


Here is the incident Kaufmann incorporated into his study, as told by a Cardiff professor who was there. As you can see, the incident involved the university intervening to *uphold* free speech principles:


Here is the first mention of the Greer at Cardiff incident in Kaufmann's report. It refers to the "concrete case" of the "no-platforming of Germaine Greer". Any reasonable reader would assume that refers to an incident of no-platforming instead of its opposite.


Here is the next mention of Greer in the report. The text asks whether the University "should have overruled protestors" and "stepped in...and guaranteed Greer the right to speak". Again the strong implication is that this did not happen and Greer was "no platformed".


The authors could easily have added a footnote at this point explaining what actually happened in Cardiff. They did not.

You May Also Like