As a result, they *can't* compete when BSV achieves higher usage than they can support.
What will it actually take for BSV to succeed?
One big thing, or many small things.
As a result, they *can't* compete when BSV achieves higher usage than they can support.
First, BSV must be able to scale. So far, it looks like the software can handle scale pretty nicely, and folks are working on further improving it.
Second, people must actually use BSV. Adoption. This also drives miners to scale, too.
One big thing, or many small things... Using BSV to work.
See, if we get one large volume business sustainably using BSV, or many small volume businesses doing so, BSV wins.
The "costly revenue" will arise on BSV, so only miners who work will earn it, while the "cheap revenue" will remain on BTC/BCH.
BSV miners will earn both cheap and costly revenue.
Hashing is only one form of Proof of Work in Bitcoin.
There's also compiling and validating transactions, hashing them into the Merkle tree, and communicating with the other miners.
Only BSV miners will maximize profits.
And with that in mind, which coin do you think they'll be more likely to sell, the cheap one, or the costly one?
That gives me incentives to maximize the value of the costly one, because I'll have higher market share.
With one big business using BSV, or many small ones.
But you know what...?

I want to encourage everyone to use BSV, not just one big business, or some small businesses.
Everyone.
I want BSV to win within the next five years.
And that is absolutely within the realm of possibility.
The more ways users have to earn BSV, the more commerce can happen on BSV.
The more ways consumers can use BSV, the more valuable BSV becomes.
The more folks we have building now, the more folks will be attracted to BSV tomorrow. Then, the more will be attracted the day after that.
It's a compounding effect.
More from Crypto
Out of curiosity I dug into how NFT's actually reference the media you're "buying" and my eyebrows are now orbiting the moon
Short version:
The NFT token you bought either points to a URL on the internet, or an IPFS hash. In most circumstances it references an IPFS gateway on the internet run by the startup you bought the NFT from.
Oh, and that URL is not the media. That URL is a JSON metadata file
Here's an example. This artwork is by Beeple and sold via Nifty:
https://t.co/TlJKH8kAew
The NFT token is for this JSON file hosted directly on Nifty's servers:
https://t.co/GQUaCnObvX
THAT file refers to the actual media you just "bought". Which in this case is hosted via a @cloudinary CDN, served by Nifty's servers again.
So if Nifty goes bust, your token is now worthless. It refers to nothing. This can't be changed.
"But you said some use IPFS!"
Let's look at the $65m Beeple, sold by Christies. Fancy.
https://t.co/1G9nCAdetk
That NFT token refers directly to an IPFS hash (https://t.co/QUdtdgtssH). We can take that IPFS hash and fetch the JSON metadata using a public gateway:
https://t.co/CoML7psBhF
Short version:
The NFT token you bought either points to a URL on the internet, or an IPFS hash. In most circumstances it references an IPFS gateway on the internet run by the startup you bought the NFT from.
Oh, and that URL is not the media. That URL is a JSON metadata file
Here's an example. This artwork is by Beeple and sold via Nifty:
https://t.co/TlJKH8kAew
The NFT token is for this JSON file hosted directly on Nifty's servers:
https://t.co/GQUaCnObvX

THAT file refers to the actual media you just "bought". Which in this case is hosted via a @cloudinary CDN, served by Nifty's servers again.
So if Nifty goes bust, your token is now worthless. It refers to nothing. This can't be changed.
"But you said some use IPFS!"
Let's look at the $65m Beeple, sold by Christies. Fancy.
https://t.co/1G9nCAdetk
That NFT token refers directly to an IPFS hash (https://t.co/QUdtdgtssH). We can take that IPFS hash and fetch the JSON metadata using a public gateway:
https://t.co/CoML7psBhF
