https://t.co/XuVdwBapnr
THREAD: The following tweets are for the purposes of stories that will appear in Sunday Times Daily. The videos and images depicted may be upsetting but are deemed to be in the public interest. This is the story of the Ayanda "Borhey" Mtila as far as we were able to verify it.

https://t.co/XuVdwBapnr
More from Crime
ICYMI
Hate Crime Indictment
Jason DeSimas
Jason Stanley
Randy Smith
Daniel Delbert Dorson
-aiding & abetting
-punched & kicked a Black man -derogatory comments about his actual & perceived race
-assaulting 2 other men who intervened to protect the
What’s a bit amazing is this hate crime took place in December of 2018 and the 4 defendants were indicted nearly two year on the nose. Because the Defendants were indicted for a hate crime.
That’s a force multiplier or at a minimum an enhancement of 10 years (addition to)
At first glance you wouldn’t think this had anything to do with White Supremacy -read page 4-
Dorson falsely claimed that he had not planned to attend a white supremacist’s “Martyr’s Day” observance in the state of WA
he had not owned a “flight jacket“
https://t.co/yU8t1DkyZA
Doc # 16 Detention Motion by USA
https://t.co/sxaBEqDLWr
“DeSimas admitted that he was a member of Crew 38,
a support club of Hammerskin Nation, a white supremacists organization...DeSimas lied to the FBI, denying that neither he nor anyone else had used the “N” word...”
always read those footnotes
3 other co-defendants are in custody
-Daniel Delbert Dorson ordered detained & will be
transferred to this District
-Randy Smith is detained in the District of OR, on an unrelated federal case
-Jason Stanley is detained at the ID DOC an unrelated case
Hate Crime Indictment
Jason DeSimas
Jason Stanley
Randy Smith
Daniel Delbert Dorson
-aiding & abetting
-punched & kicked a Black man -derogatory comments about his actual & perceived race
-assaulting 2 other men who intervened to protect the
What’s a bit amazing is this hate crime took place in December of 2018 and the 4 defendants were indicted nearly two year on the nose. Because the Defendants were indicted for a hate crime.
That’s a force multiplier or at a minimum an enhancement of 10 years (addition to)

At first glance you wouldn’t think this had anything to do with White Supremacy -read page 4-
Dorson falsely claimed that he had not planned to attend a white supremacist’s “Martyr’s Day” observance in the state of WA
he had not owned a “flight jacket“
https://t.co/yU8t1DkyZA

Doc # 16 Detention Motion by USA
https://t.co/sxaBEqDLWr
“DeSimas admitted that he was a member of Crew 38,
a support club of Hammerskin Nation, a white supremacists organization...DeSimas lied to the FBI, denying that neither he nor anyone else had used the “N” word...”

always read those footnotes
3 other co-defendants are in custody
-Daniel Delbert Dorson ordered detained & will be
transferred to this District
-Randy Smith is detained in the District of OR, on an unrelated federal case
-Jason Stanley is detained at the ID DOC an unrelated case

This is terrible weighing of the costs and benefits of the pardon power. I think Senator Murphy woefully undervalues its utility. /1
In part because the Congress of which he is a part has established no functioning second-look mechanisms for shortening sentences or expunging convictions, commutations and pardons are the only mechanisms for correcting injustices in the federal system. /2
And it's not as if those injustices are rare. Go to any federal correctional facility, and take time to learn who is there and about their cases, and you find literally thousands of people whose sentences were grossly excessive given their offenses. /3
Those people need commutations as a corrective because there is no parole or other second look in place to address that. Some have tried to use compassionate release under the First Step Act, but DOJ tries to block those efforts at every turn and it's a limited option. /4
Presidential commutations are thus the only avenue for these folks. And under President Obama, more than 1,700 regular people (not his cronies) received relief. It was woefully inadequate for the need, but it shows the value of the power. /5
Once one party allows the pardon power to become a tool of criminal enterprise, its danger to democracy outweighs its utility as an instrument of justice.
— Chris Murphy (@ChrisMurphyCT) December 24, 2020
It\u2019s time to remove the pardon power from the Constitution.
In part because the Congress of which he is a part has established no functioning second-look mechanisms for shortening sentences or expunging convictions, commutations and pardons are the only mechanisms for correcting injustices in the federal system. /2
And it's not as if those injustices are rare. Go to any federal correctional facility, and take time to learn who is there and about their cases, and you find literally thousands of people whose sentences were grossly excessive given their offenses. /3
Those people need commutations as a corrective because there is no parole or other second look in place to address that. Some have tried to use compassionate release under the First Step Act, but DOJ tries to block those efforts at every turn and it's a limited option. /4
Presidential commutations are thus the only avenue for these folks. And under President Obama, more than 1,700 regular people (not his cronies) received relief. It was woefully inadequate for the need, but it shows the value of the power. /5
You May Also Like
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
@franciscodeasis https://t.co/OuQaBRFPu7
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the
chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project
starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".
P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!
https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?
Unfortunately the "This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines." were BEFORE the

chimeric infectious clone grants were there.https://t.co/DAArwFkz6v is in 2017, Rs4231.
https://t.co/UgXygDjYbW is in 2016, RsSHC014 and RsWIV16.
https://t.co/krO69CsJ94 is in 2013, RsWIV1. notice that this is before the beginning of the project
starting in 2016. Also remember that they told about only 3 isolates/live viruses. RsSHC014 is a live infectious clone that is just as alive as those other "Isolates".
P.D. somehow is able to use funds that he have yet recieved yet, and send results and sequences from late 2019 back in time into 2015,2013 and 2016!
https://t.co/4wC7k1Lh54 Ref 3: Why ALL your pangolin samples were PCR negative? to avoid deep sequencing and accidentally reveal Paguma Larvata and Oryctolagus Cuniculus?