THREAD: I was living in @rbkc when I first learnt how to ride a bike, by taking a @TfL cycle confident course.
But despite having the skills to ride, the roads around my home were so dangerous that I could never build up the confidence to ride a bike ~properly~
Confirmation that the cycle lane on Kensington High Street, that led to a doubling in the number of cyclists within a matter of weeks, is to be removed within the next few days. pic.twitter.com/F6lUWqYM48
— APPGCW (@allpartycycling) November 28, 2020
Nope.
Looking at that road, I knew it was the kind of place where any mistake could cost me my life.
So I walked out to Hyde Park and rented a Santander Cycle to get practicing.
But that didn’t go so well either.
“If you want to cycle, get on the road!” one said.
“The only folk who should be cycling in here are little kids trying to learn,” said another.
I was too ashamed to say I was trying to learn too.
It wasn’t long after that I moved to Lambeth — and the wonderful day when a letter arrived through my door saying @lambeth_council would be turning my neighbourhood into an LTN.
I went and bought a bike.
Giving them a safe, quiet and protected place to get around by bike, to build up their confidence and to feel the freedom that cycling brings
It felt truly transformational and I was delighted for my old neighbours to have this opportunity.
I guess @rbkc hadn’t heard that we’ve all been told to stay home until next week — when many shops will re-open.
From the moment I first thought about cycling on the roads to the time I had the courage to go out there and do it was over two years for me. And it took being surrounded by safe infrastructure for me to take the plunge.
But to think you’d see a massive increase in trade DURING LOCKDOWN within two months of installing a cycle lane is just wild — and goes to show @RBKC don’t understand their residents.
Maybe they hired a bike to try it out one day.
Maybe they bought their own bike, or a bike for their child.
Maybe they were still building up to it.
You May Also Like
RT-PCR corona (test) scam
Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
4/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
...indication, first of all that testing for a (single) respiratory virus is done outside of surveillance systems or need for specific therapy, but even so the lack of consideration of Ct, symptoms and clinical findings when interpreting its result. https://t.co/gHH6kwRdZG
2/12
It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as
6/10
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) October 22, 2020
The neither validated nor standardised hypersensitive RT-PCR test / Ct 35-45 for SARS-CoV-2 is abused to mislabel (also) other diseases, especially influenza, as COVID-19.https://t.co/AkFIfTCTkS
3/12
The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.https://t.co/mbNY8bdw1p pic.twitter.com/OQBD4grMth
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) November 29, 2020
4/12
Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID
Thread web\u2b06\ufe0f\u2b07\ufe0f
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) December 16, 2020
The fabrication of the "asymptomatic (super) spreader" is the coronation of the total nons(ci)ense in the belief system of #CoronasWitnesses.
Asymptomatic transmission 0.7%; 95% CI 0%-4.9% - could well be 0%!https://t.co/VeZTzxXfvT
5/12
Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as
8/8
— Dr. Thomas Binder, MD (@Thomas_Binder) March 24, 2020
By the way, who the f*** created this obviously (almost) worldwide definition of #CoronaDeath?
This is not only medical malpractice, this is utterly insane!https://t.co/FFsTx4L2mw