Coming Sunday - 3 Hours FREE webinar.
PRICE ACTION TRADING for Option Buyers,Sellers & Future traders.
Interested traders follow the below 2 steps
1) RETWEET
2) FOLLOW us on Twitter (Twitter will allow to send message only once you follow)
Link will be shared via Twitter DM
More from Learn to Trade
VWAP for intraday Trading Part -2
A small thread.
PART 1 - https://t.co/ooxepHpYKL
Traders show your support by like & retweet to benefit all
@Mitesh_Engr @ITRADE191 @ProdigalTrader @nakulvibhor @RajarshitaS @Puretechnicals9 @AnandableAnand @Anshi_________ @ca_mehtaravi
Chart 1
Chart 2
Chart 3
Chart 4
A small thread.
PART 1 - https://t.co/ooxepHpYKL
Traders show your support by like & retweet to benefit all
@Mitesh_Engr @ITRADE191 @ProdigalTrader @nakulvibhor @RajarshitaS @Puretechnicals9 @AnandableAnand @Anshi_________ @ca_mehtaravi
VWAP for intraday Trading Part -1
— Learn to Trade (@learntotrade365) August 28, 2021
A small thread PART -2 will be released tomorrow
Traders show your support by like & retweet to benefit all@Mitesh_Engr @ITRADE191 @ProdigalTrader @nakulvibhor @ArjunB9591 @CAPratik_INDIAN @RajarshitaS @Stockstudy8 @vivbajaj @Prakashplutus pic.twitter.com/y8bwisM4hB
Chart 1
Chart 2
Chart 3
Chart 4
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
