Former CEO and future former Chairman of ATT RandaII Stephenson fun facts:
>>was chairman of Boy Scouts of America
>>was mentored by CarIos SIim
>>subsequently promoted to CFO of “southwestern bell company” (former name of ATT)
>>quickly resolved $30B in debt
>>is on CFR
😲

https://t.co/wWjV2t3bVB
And he worked for Bush telecoms ? Damn. This is a jackpot

I’m guessing This expIosion wasn’t just some expIosion
https://t.co/s0i05aaWXt

Silver lake
Silver Lake Senior Leadership

https://t.co/YLaUtP8lQa
SiIver Lake Chairman

https://t.co/rz5WNYAuUi
Blackstone Leadership

https://t.co/oYYrqtlfQN

Click and read about each one 👀😳
It’s all about your data https://t.co/0YE3OfmBkA
https://t.co/yWIj8Kv1UG
Moar ATT
https://t.co/q0XdsZZdhL
Name any major global bank
They likely have stock in AT&T

https://t.co/Fma9wkrNuR
https://t.co/vALkCFbMkL

Att owns a lot
👀 https://t.co/FK4TC15jYC
👀 https://t.co/xbY2X0fp20

More from Business

The Mother of All Squeezes

How Volkswagen went from being on the brink of bankruptcy to the most valuable company in the world in two days

/THREAD/


1/ At the peak of the 2008 financial crisis, Volkswagen was considered a very likely candidate for bankruptcy.

Heavily indebted and already financially struggling before 2008, with car sales expected to plummet due to the ongoing global crisis.


2/ With GM and Chrysler filing for bankruptcy in 2009, shorting the VW stock would seem a safe bet.

If you are not familiar with stock shorts and short squeezes check my thread


3/ On October 26, 2008, Porsche announced it had increased its stake at VW from 30% to 74%.

This was a surprise to many who were led to believe that Porsche wasn't planning a takeover of VW, based on the company's announcements.


4/ Before the announcement, the short interest was approximately 13% of the outstanding shares, a number considered relatively low.

Porsche had a 30% stake, the Lower Saxony government fund held 20% of the shares, and another 5% was held by index funds.
So I'd recommend reading this thread from Dave, but I thought about some of these policies, and how they fit into the whole, a lot, and want to offer a different interpretation.


I think California is world leading on progressivism that doesn't ask anyone to give anything up, or accept any major change, right now.

That's what I mean by symbolically progressive, operationally conservative.

Take the 100% renewable energy standard. As @leahstokes has written, these policies often fail in practice. I note our leadership on renewable energy in the piece, but the kind of politics we see on housing and transportation are going foil that if they don't change.

Creating a statewide consumer financial protection agency is great! But again, you're not asking most voters to give anything up or accept any actual changes.

I don't see that as balancing the scales on, say, high-speed rail.

CA is willing to vote for higher taxes, new agencies, etc. It was impressive when LA passed Measure H, a new sales tax to fund homeless shelters. And depressing to watch those same communities pour into the streets to protest shelters being placed near them. That's the rub.

You May Also Like