A Christmas Carol. My Brexit “take” on a popular seasonal tale. Happy Christmas everyone @mrjamesob @campbellclaret @chrisgreybrexit @rafaelbehr

It was Christmas Eve in Downing Street. PM Ebenezer Johnson was sitting alone in his office, colouring in a picture of sunny uplands. He was looking forward to a jolly Christmas and a glorious future for his country.
Suddenly there was a knock at the door and a wraith materialised in the semi-darkness. “I am”, he announced, “the Ghost of Christmas Past”. “What ho”, replied the PM, “what can I do for you? “
The ghost explained that he had been living in the attic of Number 10 since Winston Churchill’s day. Ever since It has been his practice to appear every Christmas Eve to update the PM on the country’s progress.
Over many decades, the ghost had been able to report on the great influence the UK had come to wield, in Europe and beyond, by working closely with its European neighbours; and on how the UK had used its sovereignty effectively to advance its interests.
Then, in a twinkling, the ghost disappeared as mysteriously as he had arrived.
The PM was about to say “Hang on” when a second phantom appeared, proclaiming “I am the Ghost of Christmas Present”. In a trice, the ghost and the PM were on a whistle-stop aerial tour of Europe, peering down at the 27 EU Member States, proud and comfortable in their sovereignty.
The ghost pointed out Brussels where vital decisions, crucial to the UK, continue to be taken. “But, but....”, said the PM. “Never mind”, interrupted the ghost, “our journey ahead is a long one. We must visit every country in the world that thinks Brexit is a good idea.”
“Jolly good”, said the PM. He cheered up enormously and began to hum Waltzing Matilda. “Sorry, just having a laugh”, said his ghostly friend, “forgive my sense of humour. Bye for now”.
In the blink of an eye, the PM found himself back flying over Blighty, accompanied by a third spectre who announced himself as the Ghost of Christmases Yet to Come. The new ghost pointed out, far below, some of the landmarks that would be visible at future Christmases.
“Behold”, he said, “the world-beating lorry parks, the queues of traffic slowing to a trickle approaching the coast, the shut-down factories, so proud to have traded patriotically (albeit briefly) on vastly disimproved terms. See up north the myriad Scottish and European flags.”
“Gadzooks”, said the PM, “what happened to prospering mightily?” The ghost smiled in a kindly way. The PM asked him about an abandoned fairground he could just make out in the darkness below. “That”, the ghost replied, “is all that remains of the great Brexit Festival of 2021”.
Suddenly, the PM found himself back alone at Number 10. A Dickens story sprang to his mind, something about a man called Scrooge who had been given a final opportunity to change his ways. The PM recalled vaguely that in 2016 he himself had faced a vital decision for his country.
Now what was it? The details had slipped his mind. He could remember flipping a coin. “Perhaps”, he thought, “the ghosts were right. Maybe I could just flip another coin? Future Christmases might not have to be so gloomy after all”. But then he said “Bah Humbug”, and went to bed.

More from Brexit

Two excellent questions at the end of a very sensible thread summarising the post-Brexit UK FP debate. My own take at attempting to offer an answer - ahead of the IR is as follow:


1. The two versions have a converging point: a tilt to the Indo-pacific doesn’t preclude a role as a convening power on global issues;
2. On the contrary, it underwrites the credibility for leadership on global issues, by seeking to strike two points:

A. Engaging with a part of the world in which world order and global issues are central to security, prosperity, and - not least - values;
B. Propelling the UK towards a more diversified set of economic, political, and security ties;

3. The tilt towards the Indo-Pacific whilst structurally based on a realist perception of the world, it is also deeply multilateral. Central to it is the notion of a Britain that is a convening power.
4. It is as a result a notion that stands on the ability to renew diplomacy;

5. It puts in relation to this a premium on under-utilised formats such as FPDA, 5Eyes, and indeed the Commonwealth - especially South Pacific islands;
6. It equally puts a premium on exploring new bilateral and multilateral formats. On former, Japan, Australia. On latter, Quad;

You May Also Like

Margatha Natarajar murthi - Uthirakosamangai temple near Ramanathapuram,TN
#ArudraDarisanam
Unique Natarajar made of emerlad is abt 6 feet tall.
It is always covered with sandal paste.Only on Thriuvadhirai Star in month Margazhi-Nataraja can be worshipped without sandal paste.


After removing the sandal paste,day long rituals & various abhishekam will be
https://t.co/e1Ye8DrNWb day Maragatha Nataraja sannandhi will be closed after anointing the murthi with fresh sandal paste.Maragatha Natarajar is covered with sandal paste throughout the year


as Emerald has scientific property of its molecules getting disturbed when exposed to light/water/sound.This is an ancient Shiva temple considered to be 3000 years old -believed to be where Bhagwan Shiva gave Veda gyaana to Parvati Devi.This temple has some stunning sculptures.
A brief analysis and comparison of the CSS for Twitter's PWA vs Twitter's legacy desktop website. The difference is dramatic and I'll touch on some reasons why.

Legacy site *downloads* ~630 KB CSS per theme and writing direction.

6,769 rules
9,252 selectors
16.7k declarations
3,370 unique declarations
44 media queries
36 unique colors
50 unique background colors
46 unique font sizes
39 unique z-indices

https://t.co/qyl4Bt1i5x


PWA *incrementally generates* ~30 KB CSS that handles all themes and writing directions.

735 rules
740 selectors
757 declarations
730 unique declarations
0 media queries
11 unique colors
32 unique background colors
15 unique font sizes
7 unique z-indices

https://t.co/w7oNG5KUkJ


The legacy site's CSS is what happens when hundreds of people directly write CSS over many years. Specificity wars, redundancy, a house of cards that can't be fixed. The result is extremely inefficient and error-prone styling that punishes users and developers.

The PWA's CSS is generated on-demand by a JS framework that manages styles and outputs "atomic CSS". The framework can enforce strict constraints and perform optimisations, which is why the CSS is so much smaller and safer. Style conflicts and unbounded CSS growth are avoided.