#AxisBank
Seems big move coming up 👀
Looks bullish here at 751
Can do 785/795 in June series and 841 by July series
Invalid below 725

More from Prashant Bhansali
#EW
Here's my view based on EW purely for long term
We could witness a big big 3rd wave in coming months
#investmentidea https://t.co/5laFyd8A7X

(30) #GreavesCotton monthly chart
— Prashant Bhansali (@prashant280294) June 25, 2021
Big monthly breakout underway
Is it time to move to next orbit higher ? Looks like! #PB365 pic.twitter.com/CB0OtIow7G
Not looking good.
#RELIANCE update
— Prashant Bhansali (@prashant280294) April 28, 2022
Was expecting 5th wave rally towards 2800-3000 as mentioned in previous post
Move played out, but now not worth chasing anymore
Not saying the move is over, it can still go up bit more, but riskreward not good for positional longs now on, I would stay away. https://t.co/eoLshLoLBD pic.twitter.com/G0qZAEBRIX
More from Axisbank
You May Also Like
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.

Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)

There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.

At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?