If I were interviewing a junior dev who had no work experience, hereโ€™s what would impress me ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿงต

Form a group with one or two others, and work to complete a side project together. Give your group a name. Decide on a high level idea. It doesnโ€™t need to be extremely challenging, but it should be enough work to give each of you a handful or more of small tasks.
You donโ€™t need anything other than GitHub issues to break down the work for each other. Create tickets to divide the work into individual contributions as best you can. Donโ€™t over think this part, just do your best and get coding.
Start coding, and create PRs. Add continuous integration, and review each otherโ€™s PRs. Donโ€™t approve PRs unless the tests are passing and youโ€™ve critically reviewed code. For tooling Travis CI is free for open source projects. it may be annoying to set up but donโ€™t skip this.
Set up deployment so you can see your project in the wild as you build. This is the fun part of coding. Vercel and Netlify are good options.
Keep at it until itโ€™s done. This wonโ€™t be easy at all, but if you are able to complete you will have demonstrated: 1. You communicate and organize. 2. You deliver. 3. You accept feedback from others. 3. You have leadership and initiative to see something from nothing to success
You will have natural answers to common interview questions like: โ€œtell me a time you had a disagreement with someoneโ€. Or โ€œtell me a time you overcame a setbackโ€. You will basically have work experience, which is the easiest way to get an interview / hired.
The biggest takeaway is do not work alone. anyone can code alone. Coding professionally means you need to work with other humans.

More from All

Ivor Cummins has been wrong (or lying) almost entirely throughout this pandemic and got paid handsomly for it.

He has been wrong (or lying) so often that it will be nearly impossible for me to track every grift, lie, deceit, manipulation he has pulled. I will use...


... other sources who have been trying to shine on light on this grifter (as I have tried to do, time and again:


Example #1: "Still not seeing Sweden signal versus Denmark really"... There it was (Images attached).
19 to 80 is an over 300% difference.

Tweet: https://t.co/36FnYnsRT9


Example #2 - "Yes, I'm comparing the Noridcs / No, you cannot compare the Nordics."

I wonder why...

Tweets: https://t.co/XLfoX4rpck / https://t.co/vjE1ctLU5x


Example #3 - "I'm only looking at what makes the data fit in my favour" a.k.a moving the goalposts.

Tweets: https://t.co/vcDpTu3qyj / https://t.co/CA3N6hC2Lq

You May Also Like

๐™Ž๐™๐™–๐™ง๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ ๐™ข๐™ฎ ๐™ฌ๐™ž๐™จ๐™™๐™ค๐™ข ๐‘พ๐’๐’'๐’• ๐’ƒ๐’† ๐’”๐’–๐’“๐’‘๐’“๐’Š๐’”๐’†๐’… ๐’Š๐’‡ ๐’•๐’๐’Ž๐’๐’“๐’“๐’๐’˜ ๐’– ๐’“๐’†๐’‚๐’… ๐’•๐’‰๐’† ๐’”๐’‚๐’Ž๐’† ๐’”๐’•๐’–๐’‡๐’‡ ๐’Š๐’ 50๐’Œ ๐’˜๐’๐’“๐’Œ๐’”๐’‰๐’๐’‘ ๐’๐’“ ๐’”๐’๐’Ž๐’†๐’๐’๐’† ๐’Ž๐’‚๐’๐’‚๐’ˆ๐’Š๐’๐’ˆ ๐’š๐’๐’–๐’“ ๐’Ž๐’๐’๐’†๐’š ๐’˜๐’Š๐’•๐’‰ ๐’”๐’‚๐’Ž๐’† ๐’๐’๐’ˆ๐’Š๐’„
Simple and effective way 2 make Money


Idea 1:- Use pivot level like 14800 in case of nifty and sell 14800straddle monthly expiry (365+335) exit if nifty closes on daily basis below S1 or above R1

After closing below S1 if it closes above S1 next day or any day enter the same position again vice versa for R1

Idea2:- Use R1 and S1 corresponding strikes multiple
Incase of R1 15337 take 15300ce
N in case of S1 14221 use 14200pe
Sell both and hold till expiry or exit if nifty closes below S1 or above R1 around closing
If the same bounces above S1 and falls below R1 re-enfer same strikes

Use same criteria for nifty, usdinr and banknifty

(This is must)Use this margin rule for 1lot banknifty pair keep 4Lax margin
For nifty one lot keep 3Lax
For usdinr 100lots keep 4Lax

I bet you if you do this on consistent basis your ROI will be more than 70% on yearly basis.

Couldn't explain easier than this

Criticisms are most welcomed.
Iโ€™m torn on how to approach the idea of luck. Iโ€™m the first to admit that I am one of the luckiest people on the planet. To be born into a prosperous American family in 1960 with smart parents is to start life on third base. The odds against my very existence are astronomical.


Iโ€™ve always felt that the luckiest people I know had a talent for recognizing circumstances, not of their own making, that were conducive to a favorable outcome and their ability to quickly take advantage of them.

In other words, dumb luck was just that, it required no awareness on the personโ€™s part, whereas โ€œsmartโ€ luck involved awareness followed by action before the circumstances changed.

So, was I โ€œluckyโ€ to be born when I wasโ€”nothing I had any control overโ€”and that I came of age just as huge databases and computers were advancing to the point where I could use those tools to write โ€œWhat Works on Wall Street?โ€ Absolutely.

Was I lucky to start my stock market investments near the peak of interest rates which allowed me to spend the majority of my adult life in a falling rate environment? Yup.