THE THIRD WAVE

Question: Has Mass Vaccination Decreased or Increased COVID-19 Mortality in Sweden?

Fundamentally, that question comes down to whether we believe the sharp and unexpected resurgence in the virus concomitant with the onset of mass vaccination was driven by mass vaccination, or we believe that is simply a coincidence.
Mass vaccination started in Sweden around the turn of the year. The rate of vaccination has been relatively slow compared to the US but, as in Florida, the campaign has prioritized the elderly. So, by now most of the population at risk of dying of COVID-19 have been vaccinated.
At the time the campaign started, COVID-19 was clearly in retreat, having peaked sometime in December. The magnitude of the fall/winter wave was in line with the "worst-case" scenario modeled by the FHM last summer.
So, at the time the vaccines were rolled out, the epidemic was behaving as expected, with a seasonal resurgence followed by decline as population immunity hit the higher threshold entailed by peak season R0s.
Going into the new year, the baseline expectation would be that the decline should have continued, driven by overshoot pushing community immunity still further above the herd immunity threshold and reducing intrinsic R0s moving away from the annual maximum.
Also, although NPIs have over and over been shown to have little impact on the spread of COVID-19, the trend in NPIs in Sweden was in any case towards greater stringency as the somewhat complacent country became alarmed by the scale of the fall seasonal resurgence.
The trend reversals that kick in around a couple of weeks after the start of mass vaccination is striking and remarkable. True, immunity might roll off -- but that de-inflection seems far too sharp to be caused by such an effect.
And, a purely phenomenal "casedemic," such as was seen last year associated with the rollout of mass testing campaigns, seems unlikely because ICUs started filling up, too, with a trend concordant with the "case" trend.
Perhaps the most plausible explanation is that new variants of the virus caused the third wave. And, certainly there has been much talk of variants lately, most of which has proved overblown.
Mutations -- particularly immuno-evasive mutations -- are in the mix all the time, part of the ongoing war between an emergent pathogen and collective immunity -- a war which is always won eventually by immunity.
We did not see striking trend reversals last year, other than what could be readily explained by seasonality, even as the virus raged across Europe & the Americas. If variants are to blame, why are we seeing this now? Has anything happened that could be driving this phenomenon?
The obvious answer is the mass vaccination rollout, which in Sweden and in a number of other countries shows a striking temporal correlation with the emergence of unexpected new waves of COVID-19.
And, such an effect is not unanticipated. Vaccinologist @GVDBossche has been predicting disastrous consequences from the vaccine rollout for some months, based on arguments (a little too subtle for my understanding) about how they would drive immuno-evasive strain emergence.
Others, including @BretWeinstein and yours truly, have been raising concerns for months about the risk that the Spike-only vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, AZ and J&J) might provide both a soft target and a set of training wheels for the virus to mutate to more immuno-evasive forms.
Weinstein has compared the mass vaccination programs to a global GoF experiment with the virus. That seems like a good way of thinking about it.
Here's a lengthy but very interesting interview between @GVDBossche and @BretWeinstein on the subject...

https://t.co/19Du3A2zWI
My best guess, having followed Sweden's C19 stats very closely for a year now, is their "third wave" is due to immuno-evasive variants. The sudden rise of these variants could well be due to mass vaccination, based on similar coincidences elsewhere and mechanistic plausibility.
One way to look at the question of causation might be to do a very nuanced, fine-grained analysis of the trends to see if local trend reversals are or are not correlated with local vaccination campaigns.
I must admit, at this point I don't have much faith that even the sensible Swedes, who have been the voice of reason in the pandemic, are ready to "go there" if the answer turns out to be the "bad answer."
At a mortality level, the impact of Sweden's third wave has been fairly modest. Deaths haven't gone down as fast as one might expect, but they haven't tracked positive tests and ICU admits.
Assuming the immuno-evasive variant explanation for the wave is correct (regardless of cause), this decoupling could be explained by: (a) widespread pre-existing immunity leading to reinfections with only moderate disease progression, acting in concert with ...
(b) progressive protection of the primary at-risk population -- the >65s and especially the >80s -- by vaccination. Of note, I believe in Sweden the ICU admits are mostly non-elderly who tend to recover, as their system discourages heroic efforts to prolong the life of the aged.

More from All

You May Also Like

The entire discussion around Facebook’s disclosures of what happened in 2016 is very frustrating. No exec stopped any investigations, but there were a lot of heated discussions about what to publish and when.


In the spring and summer of 2016, as reported by the Times, activity we traced to GRU was reported to the FBI. This was the standard model of interaction companies used for nation-state attacks against likely US targeted.

In the Spring of 2017, after a deep dive into the Fake News phenomena, the security team wanted to publish an update that covered what we had learned. At this point, we didn’t have any advertising content or the big IRA cluster, but we did know about the GRU model.

This report when through dozens of edits as different equities were represented. I did not have any meetings with Sheryl on the paper, but I can’t speak to whether she was in the loop with my higher-ups.

In the end, the difficult question of attribution was settled by us pointing to the DNI report instead of saying Russia or GRU directly. In my pre-briefs with members of Congress, I made it clear that we believed this action was GRU.
🌺श्री गरुड़ पुराण - संक्षिप्त वर्णन🌺

हिन्दु धर्म के 18 पुराणों में से एक गरुड़ पुराण का हिन्दु धर्म में बड़ा महत्व है। गरुड़ पुराण में मृत्यु के बाद सद्गती की व्याख्या मिलती है। इस पुराण के अधिष्ठातृ देव भगवान विष्णु हैं, इसलिए ये वैष्णव पुराण है।


गरुड़ पुराण के अनुसार हमारे कर्मों का फल हमें हमारे जीवन-काल में तो मिलता ही है परंतु मृत्यु के बाद भी अच्छे बुरे कार्यों का उनके अनुसार फल मिलता है। इस कारण इस पुराण में निहित ज्ञान को प्राप्त करने के लिए घर के किसी सदस्य की मृत्यु के बाद का समय निर्धारित किया गया है...

..ताकि उस समय हम जीवन-मरण से जुड़े सभी सत्य जान सकें और मृत्यु के कारण बिछडने वाले सदस्य का दुख कम हो सके।
गरुड़ पुराण में विष्णु की भक्ति व अवतारों का विस्तार से उसी प्रकार वर्णन मिलता है जिस प्रकार भगवत पुराण में।आरम्भ में मनु से सृष्टि की उत्पत्ति,ध्रुव चरित्र की कथा मिलती है।


तदुपरांत सुर्य व चंद्र ग्रहों के मंत्र, शिव-पार्वती मंत्र,इन्द्र सम्बंधित मंत्र,सरस्वती मंत्र और नौ शक्तियों के बारे में विस्तार से बताया गया है।
इस पुराण में उन्नीस हज़ार श्लोक बताए जाते हैं और इसे दो भागों में कहा जाता है।
प्रथम भाग में विष्णुभक्ति और पूजा विधियों का उल्लेख है।

मृत्यु के उपरांत गरुड़ पुराण के श्रवण का प्रावधान है ।
पुराण के द्वितीय भाग में 'प्रेतकल्प' का विस्तार से वर्णन और नरकों में जीव के पड़ने का वृत्तांत मिलता है। मरने के बाद मनुष्य की क्या गति होती है, उसका किस प्रकार की योनियों में जन्म होता है, प्रेत योनि से मुक्ति के उपाय...
1/12

RT-PCR corona (test) scam

Symptomatic people are tested for one and only one respiratory virus. This means that other acute respiratory infections are reclassified as


2/12

It is tested exquisitely with a hypersensitive non-specific RT-PCR test / Ct >35 (>30 is nonsense, >35 is madness), without considering Ct and clinical context. This means that more acute respiratory infections are reclassified as


3/12

The Drosten RT-PCR test is fabricated in a way that each country and laboratory perform it differently at too high Ct and that the high rate of false positives increases massively due to cross-reaction with other (corona) viruses in the "flu


4/12

Even asymptomatic, previously called healthy, people are tested (en masse) in this way, although there is no epidemiologically relevant asymptomatic transmission. This means that even healthy people are declared as COVID


5/12

Deaths within 28 days after a positive RT-PCR test from whatever cause are designated as deaths WITH COVID. This means that other causes of death are reclassified as