Today, @SenateBanking is holding the hearing "Separate and Unequal: The Legacy of Racial Discrimination in Housing."

Follow along on this

@ItsLisaRice opens: "There are over 4 million instances of housing discrimination that occur each year"
Richard Rothstein of @NAACP_LDF explains how the racial wealth gap is built on and exacerbated by yesteryears's racist policies based on exclusion in housing
@SherrodBrown to Richard Rothstein "for those who might be skeptical, explain why the government has an obligation to remedy the harmful discrimination that it perpetuated"

More from All

You May Also Like

This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".


The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.


Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)


There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.


At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?