Authors 👑Mαχιмυs🎭Lєgαcy👑
7 days
30 days
All time
Recent
Popular
I do not “grasp at straws”, @LarrySchweikart and you are not the only person with an education.👨🎓
-First, re the Electoral Slates for Trump: they are currently *uncertified*. We hope to get them retroactively certified.
-I sincerely hope you are helping us do this by organizing your followers to make phone calls to their Legislators, instead of complaining about the process. No time for that.
-Secondly, I will address, once again, the historic role of the @VP vis-à-vis 12A & ECA of 1887.
-Because of the ambiguity of 12A, its passive voice phrasing, I posit the “President of the Senate” has the exclusive constitutional authority to determine which “certificates” to “open” and thus which electoral votes “to be counted” in the event competing slates arrive.
-Now, you are coming from the Electoral Count Act of 1887, which is a convoluted mess.
-You inferred the Trump electors are "illegitimate”.
-Well, the Act says only the votes “appointed in accordance with the laws of the State” may be "counted".
OBJECTION! LOL!😝
-Trump loyal Rs shall argue the “executive certified” slates are illegitimate because of election irregularities from the contested states.
-But what if the Trump slates are not certified by 1/6? Then both will be thrown out.
-First, re the Electoral Slates for Trump: they are currently *uncertified*. We hope to get them retroactively certified.
authority to "throw out" an electoral slate and accept another.
— Larry Schweikart (@LarrySchweikart) December 17, 2020
I know our side is depressed & grasping at straws, but this ain't it.
-I sincerely hope you are helping us do this by organizing your followers to make phone calls to their Legislators, instead of complaining about the process. No time for that.
-Secondly, I will address, once again, the historic role of the @VP vis-à-vis 12A & ECA of 1887.
-Because of the ambiguity of 12A, its passive voice phrasing, I posit the “President of the Senate” has the exclusive constitutional authority to determine which “certificates” to “open” and thus which electoral votes “to be counted” in the event competing slates arrive.
-Now, you are coming from the Electoral Count Act of 1887, which is a convoluted mess.
-You inferred the Trump electors are "illegitimate”.
-Well, the Act says only the votes “appointed in accordance with the laws of the State” may be "counted".
OBJECTION! LOL!😝
-Trump loyal Rs shall argue the “executive certified” slates are illegitimate because of election irregularities from the contested states.
-But what if the Trump slates are not certified by 1/6? Then both will be thrown out.