When it comes to Web development, HTML is the first choice. Web development generally comprises 3 fundamentals: basically HTML, CSS, and JAVASCRIPT.
Being developers, we work with many different languages.
Which makes it humanly impossible to remember all its aspects.
This is when a "Cheat Sheet" comes super-handy.
Here's the ultimate list of Cheatsheets for Web Developers👇🏻↓
When it comes to Web development, HTML is the first choice. Web development generally comprises 3 fundamentals: basically HTML, CSS, and JAVASCRIPT.
Looking for a cheat sheet that contains useful code examples and web developer tools, markup generators, and more? Well, you’re going to love this.
It covers all the basic syntax along with proper examples.
🔗 https://t.co/VwnLHVT8BV
If you believe in learning by examples: Let me tell you about this one.
It is a free guide to HTML. You will find all the elements and attributes with proper examples for a better understanding.
🔗 https://t.co/I9ldkR5qT6
As we know CSS has a number of properties.
Do you remember them all? I guess nobody does. So what’s the hack? These cheat sheets are a hack.
🔗 https://t.co/3ohDkiC1ir
CSS Cheat Sheet contains the most common style snippets: CSS gradient, background, button, font family, border, radius, box, text-shadow generators, color picker, and more.
🔗 https://t.co/sUE9Za1bHA
Learn all about the properties available in the Grid Layout through simple visual examples. I as a developer use this handy cheat sheet all the time.
🔗 https://t.co/1ws4qycjVo
Learn all about the properties available in flexbox through simple visual examples.
You need to fix the alignment of your webpage but you don’t know which property would work? Take a look at these cheat sheets.
🔗 https://t.co/VlP2lCisRP
This 13-page cheat sheet will take you from a beginner to advanced on the fundamentals of JavaScript.
Giving you proper terminologies, and syntax of common constructs.
🔗 https://t.co/Y6BZqRGRBO
This JavaScript cheat sheet comes with the most important concepts, functions, methods, and more.
A complete quick reference for beginners.
🔗 https://t.co/EmTVYHaKdN
This document is a cheat sheet for JavaScript containing tips, tricks, and best practices you will frequently encounter in modern projects and most contemporary sample code.
🔗 https://t.co/kNAXJtJB0S
Looking for a quick reference to React.js? Have a look at this cheat sheet.
This guide targets React v15 to v16.
🔗 https://t.co/UVdqyV8r2l
Cheatography has thousands of incredible, original programming cheat sheets. You will find everything related to a particular programming language and can easily download them.
🔗 https://t.co/uw2tQ4CIdR
This website aggregates cheat sheets for many popular programming languages such as JavaScript, NodeJS, PHP, Python, and CSS.
🔗 https://t.co/sPrPoS3YMU
This cheat sheet is a compilation of some of the most popular languages: The history of web development, React cheat sheet, React Router cheat sheet, Redux cheat sheet, ES6 cheat sheet, and Request cheat sheet.
🔗 https://t.co/tALjaVBCey
Happy coding! 🙌🏻
If you enjoyed this thread:
1. Follow me @Insharamin for more of these
2. RT the tweet below to share this thread with your audience https://t.co/Ef7sL76oMk
Being developers, we work with many different languages.
— Insha (@Insharamin) May 11, 2022
Which makes it humanly impossible to remember all its aspects.
This is when a "Cheat Sheet" comes super-handy.
Here's the ultimate list of Cheatsheets for Web Developers\U0001f447\U0001f3fb\u2193
You May Also Like
"I lied about my basic beliefs in order to keep a prestigious job. Now that it will be zero-cost to me, I have a few things to say."
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
As a dean of a major academic institution, I could not have said this. But I will now. Requiring such statements in applications for appointments and promotions is an affront to academic freedom, and diminishes the true value of diversity, equity of inclusion by trivializing it. https://t.co/NfcI5VLODi
— Jeffrey Flier (@jflier) November 10, 2018
We know that elite institutions like the one Flier was in (partial) charge of rely on irrelevant status markers like private school education, whiteness, legacy, and ability to charm an old white guy at an interview.
Harvard's discriminatory policies are becoming increasingly well known, across the political spectrum (see, e.g., the recent lawsuit on discrimination against East Asian applications.)
It's refreshing to hear a senior administrator admits to personally opposing policies that attempt to remedy these basic flaws. These are flaws that harm his institution's ability to do cutting-edge research and to serve the public.
Harvard is being eclipsed by institutions that have different ideas about how to run a 21st Century institution. Stanford, for one; the UC system; the "public Ivys".
![Peter McCormack [Jan/3\u279e\u20bf \U0001f511\u220e]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1524287442307723265/_59ITDbJ_normal.jpg)
So the cryptocurrency industry has basically two products, one which is relatively benign and doesn't have product market fit, and one which is malignant and does. The industry has a weird superposition of understanding this fact and (strategically?) not understanding it.
The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.
This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.
The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."
This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.
If everyone was holding bitcoin on the old x86 in their parents basement, we would be finding a price bottom. The problem is the risk is all pooled at a few brokerages and a network of rotten exchanges with counter party risk that makes AIG circa 2008 look like a good credit.
— Greg Wester (@gwestr) November 25, 2018
The benign product is sovereign programmable money, which is historically a niche interest of folks with a relatively clustered set of beliefs about the state, the literary merit of Snow Crash, and the utility of gold to the modern economy.
This product has narrow appeal and, accordingly, is worth about as much as everything else on a 486 sitting in someone's basement is worth.
The other product is investment scams, which have approximately the best product market fit of anything produced by humans. In no age, in no country, in no city, at no level of sophistication do people consistently say "Actually I would prefer not to get money for nothing."
This product needs the exchanges like they need oxygen, because the value of it is directly tied to having payment rails to move real currency into the ecosystem and some jurisdictional and regulatory legerdemain to stay one step ahead of the banhammer.
This is a pretty valiant attempt to defend the "Feminist Glaciology" article, which says conventional wisdom is wrong, and this is a solid piece of scholarship. I'll beg to differ, because I think Jeffery, here, is confusing scholarship with "saying things that seem right".
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?
Imagine for a moment the most obscurantist, jargon-filled, po-mo article the politically correct academy might produce. Pure SJW nonsense. Got it? Chances are you're imagining something like the infamous "Feminist Glaciology" article from a few years back.https://t.co/NRaWNREBvR pic.twitter.com/qtSFBYY80S
— Jeffrey Sachs (@JeffreyASachs) October 13, 2018
The article is, at heart, deeply weird, even essentialist. Here, for example, is the claim that proposing climate engineering is a "man" thing. Also a "man" thing: attempting to get distance from a topic, approaching it in a disinterested fashion.
Also a "man" thing—physical courage. (I guess, not quite: physical courage "co-constitutes" masculinist glaciology along with nationalism and colonialism.)
There's criticism of a New York Times article that talks about glaciology adventures, which makes a similar point.
At the heart of this chunk is the claim that glaciology excludes women because of a narrative of scientific objectivity and physical adventure. This is a strong claim! It's not enough to say, hey, sure, sounds good. Is it true?