Only one Indian company is making the country pound in the US when it comes to Biologics #Biocon @Bioconlimited 👏👏
Company floated and nurtured by a women despite all the gender biases. How can the gents be beaten by a lady?
More from Sajal Kapoor
@connectgurmeet Real estate - unseen exposure
Playing real estate and home improvement structural story in \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3 via a focused proxy consumption \U0001f9fa
— Conviction | Patience (@unseenvalue) January 10, 2020
1. Asian Paints
2. Pidilite
3. SHIL (Hindware portfolio)
4. Fragrance SpecChem (Kelkar & Fairchem)
Consumption | Proxy Consumption
More from Uvlearnings
Conviction | Patience
Asian Paints is the TCS of 'Home Improvement' space
Think in terms of ::
- Sustainability of Leadership over decades
- Sustainability of Consumption Megatrend
- Sustainability of CFO and Governance
- Quality of Balance Sheet
Rather than absolute MCap
Asian Paints is the TCS of 'Home Improvement' space
Think in terms of ::
- Sustainability of Leadership over decades
- Sustainability of Consumption Megatrend
- Sustainability of CFO and Governance
- Quality of Balance Sheet
Rather than absolute MCap
Conviction | Patience
— Sajal Kapoor (@unseenvalue) December 30, 2019
TCS of CDMO in the making over the next 15Y \U0001f1ee\U0001f1f3
Compounding @ 25% since the IPO.
Syngene | Revisit 2030-2040 https://t.co/PHd8UEod5X
You May Also Like
I just finished Eric Adler's The Battle of the Classics, and wanted to say something about Joel Christiansen's review linked below. I am not sure what motivates the review (I speculate a bit below), but it gives a very misleading impression of the book. 1/x
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x
As someone\u2019s who\u2019s read the book, this review strikes me as tremendously unfair. It mostly faults Adler for not writing the book the reviewer wishes he had! https://t.co/pqpt5Ziivj
— Teresa M. Bejan (@tmbejan) January 12, 2021
The meat of the criticism is that the history Adler gives is insufficiently critical. Adler describes a few figures who had a great influence on how the modern US university was formed. It's certainly critical: it focuses on the social Darwinism of these figures. 2/x
Other insinuations and suggestions in the review seem wildly off the mark, distorted, or inappropriate-- for example, that the book is clickbaity (it is scholarly) or conservative (hardly) or connected to the events at the Capitol (give me a break). 3/x
The core question: in what sense is classics inherently racist? Classics is old. On Adler's account, it begins in ancient Rome and is revived in the Renaissance. Slavery (Christiansen's primary concern) is also very old. Let's say classics is an education for slaveowners. 4/x
It's worth remembering that literacy itself is elite throughout most of this history. Literacy is, then, also the education of slaveowners. We can honor oral and musical traditions without denying that literacy is, generally, good. 5/x